[openstack-dev] TC membership evolution, take 2

Mark McLoughlin markmc at redhat.com
Fri May 31 12:45:16 UTC 2013


On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 08:06 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> And if that's true... why not just give the flat 11 a shot. If it seems 
> to work, cool. Super low maintenance, no bikeshedding on categories, no 
> PTL growth concerns blocking things from getting incubated.
> 
> If not, in 6 months or a year we revisit. Which we'd have to do on any 
> category based model anyway. If OpenStack has taught me anything, it's 
> that predicting where OpenStack is going to be in a year is really hard. 
> Encoding the future structure of the TC, based on a snapshot of what 
> OpenStack seems to care about today, just seems doomed to unoptimal results. 

That's very much my feeling too.

I'm actually pretty disappointed that some of us see so much danger!
(Will Robinson) in the flat 11 model.

Cheers,
Mark.




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list