Open Stack

Thanks Eugene. The new directory structure seems fine to me. I am not
sure I completely understand the motivation behind moving the tests,
but if others find it convenient, it should be good.

In general, it would have been nice if we had followed either the
approach of moving everything related to a particular service under a
service, or we keep the current approach.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
<enikanorov at mirantis.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Following up team meeting:
> leaving db plugin in quantum/db/loadbalancer/
>
> But I would still suggest to move loadbalancer db unit test file from
> tests/unit/db/loadbalancer to a loadbalancer service-related directory.
> Reason: it's more convenient to run unit tests for the whole service
> specifying a path to service test directory (something like 'run_tests.py
> services.loadbalancer') instead of passing several different paths as
> arguments.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Also, It seems that there is agreement to move services directory one level
> up.
> Could you confirm that?
>
> This also would require (or at least it seems to be reasonable) to move
> plugins/common/constants.py one level up and merge with common/constants.py
> or name it something like common/plugin_constants.py.
>
> I have updated the wiki page:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Quantum/ServiceDirectoryStructure
>
> Thanks,
> Eugene.
>
>