We've got it in BillingStack as well. Though it's not active atm. Endre. 2013/6/3 David Ripton <dripton at redhat.com> > On 06/03/2013 12:34 PM, Douglas Mendizabal wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> We're using SQLAlchemy in the Barbican project and we're looking add db >> schema migrations. We looked at sqlalchemy-migrate since it is being >> used in a few other projects, but the docs recommend using Alembic for >> new projects. >> >> We're thinking of going with Alembic, since it seems it's better >> maintained. Just wanted to reach out to the mailing list to see if >> anyone had any input for/against Alembic. >> > > The grass is always greener on the other side, but I totally suggest > Alembic. sqlalchemy-migrate's overly-linear nature causes pain for Nova on > a regular basis. (For example, there are currently multiple patches in > review with migrate #185. Whichever one doesn't get in first will have to > rename and re-review.) > > -- > David Ripton Red Hat dripton at redhat.com > > > ______________________________**_________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.**org <OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org> > http://lists.openstack.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**openstack-dev<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130603/4c5919e5/attachment.html>