[openstack-dev] [barbican] DB Migrations

Endre Karlson endre.karlson at gmail.com
Mon Jun 3 21:57:39 UTC 2013


We've got it in BillingStack as well. Though it's not active atm.

Endre.


2013/6/3 David Ripton <dripton at redhat.com>

> On 06/03/2013 12:34 PM, Douglas Mendizabal wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We're using SQLAlchemy in the Barbican project and we're looking add db
>> schema migrations.  We looked at sqlalchemy-migrate since it is being
>> used in a few other projects, but the docs recommend using Alembic for
>> new projects.
>>
>> We're thinking of going with Alembic, since it seems it's better
>> maintained.  Just wanted to reach out to the mailing list to see if
>> anyone had any input for/against Alembic.
>>
>
> The grass is always greener on the other side, but I totally suggest
> Alembic.  sqlalchemy-migrate's overly-linear nature causes pain for Nova on
> a regular basis.  (For example, there are currently multiple patches in
> review with migrate #185.  Whichever one doesn't get in first will have to
> rename and re-review.)
>
> --
> David Ripton   Red Hat   dripton at redhat.com
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.**org <OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**openstack-dev<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130603/4c5919e5/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list