On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Mac Innes, Kiall <kiall at hp.com> wrote: > While the topic of WSME is open - Has anyone actually tried using it? > > <snip> > > I would be very cautious about assuming WSME can support anything we > need when the absolute fundamentals of building a REST API are totally MIA. There was a whole thread about this a couple of months ago [1]. tl;dr Ceilometer is already using it. I have a rough patch for what would be v3 of Cinder using Pecan/WSME for J if we decide we need a bump [2]. Neutron will likely be using it when it switches to Pecan. For Cinder, WSME raises a 400 on type checking in the body as I need it to. Everything else I have raised in the controller as needed. Thanks, Mike Perez [1] - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-June/009824.html [2] - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-June/010857.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130805/47591306/attachment.html>