Open Stack

On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 09:24 -0600, John Griffith wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>         Hey!
>         
>         On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 11:01 -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:
>         > I know everyone loves looking at numbers around this time.
>         I'm sure
>         > there will be several new reports on which people or
>         companies did the
>         > most. I wanted to poke at a slightly different thing - which
>         is overall
>         > combined community effort.
>         >
>         >                       Essex   Folsom  Grizzly
>         > Patches Uploaded      11036   17986   29308
>         > Changes Created               5137    5990    12721
>         > Changes Landed                4235    4978    10561
>         > Avg patches per Change        2.6     3.6     2.7
>         > Landing Percentage    82%     83%     83%
>         >
>         > Clearly our velocity continues to increase, which is great.
>         Something
>         > happened during folsom to cause us to need to on-average
>         iterate more to
>         > get a change landed, but then we corrected the ship during
>         grizzly. I'm
>         > more fascinated by the fact that our percentage of changes
>         created to
>         > changes landed is holding extremely steady.
>         >
>         > Great work at managing the firehose everybody!
>         
>         
>         Indeed, those are amazing stats! Nice one Monty.
>         
>         I sent out gitdm based "Who wrote Essex/Folsom" stats in
>         previous
>         releases:
>         
>           https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg09650.html
>           https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg17006.html
>         
>         and I've done them again for Grizzly:
>         
>         
>         https://github.com/markmc/openstack-gitdm/blob/results/grizzly/git-stats.txt
>         
>         Frankly, though, I'm losing faith in this "number of commits"
>         statistic
>         being all that useful. Most of my commits were probably
>         trivial cfg
>         cleanups in Nova.
>         
>         Also, bitergia's stats are getting more and more
>         comprehensive:
>         
>         
>         http://blog.bitergia.com/2013/04/04/companies-contributing-to-openstack-grizzly-analysis/
>         
>         So ... consider openstack-gitdm orphaned and open to a new
>         maintainer :-)
>         
>         Cheers,
>         Mark.
>         
>         
> FWIW there seems to be a bug in your algorithm, keying off of only a
> single Author name.  A number of us have aliases, modifying your query
> to use email seems to yield different results.  

There's an openstack-config/aliases file for this

Cheers,
Mark.