Open Stack

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, John Griffith
<john.griffith at solidfire.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey!
>>
>> On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 11:01 -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:
>> > I know everyone loves looking at numbers around this time. I'm sure
>> > there will be several new reports on which people or companies did the
>> > most. I wanted to poke at a slightly different thing - which is overall
>> > combined community effort.
>> >
>> >                       Essex   Folsom  Grizzly
>> > Patches Uploaded      11036   17986   29308
>> > Changes Created               5137    5990    12721
>> > Changes Landed                4235    4978    10561
>> > Avg patches per Change        2.6     3.6     2.7
>> > Landing Percentage    82%     83%     83%
>> >
>> > Clearly our velocity continues to increase, which is great. Something
>> > happened during folsom to cause us to need to on-average iterate more to
>> > get a change landed, but then we corrected the ship during grizzly. I'm
>> > more fascinated by the fact that our percentage of changes created to
>> > changes landed is holding extremely steady.
>> >
>> > Great work at managing the firehose everybody!
>>
>> Indeed, those are amazing stats! Nice one Monty.
>>
>> I sent out gitdm based "Who wrote Essex/Folsom" stats in previous
>> releases:
>>
>>   https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg09650.html
>>   https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg17006.html
>>
>> and I've done them again for Grizzly:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/markmc/openstack-gitdm/blob/results/grizzly/git-stats.txt
>>
>> Frankly, though, I'm losing faith in this "number of commits" statistic
>> being all that useful. Most of my commits were probably trivial cfg
>> cleanups in Nova.
>>
>> Also, bitergia's stats are getting more and more comprehensive:
>>
>>
>> http://blog.bitergia.com/2013/04/04/companies-contributing-to-openstack-grizzly-analysis/
>>
>> So ... consider openstack-gitdm orphaned and open to a new
>> maintainer :-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark.
>>
>> FWIW there seems to be a bug in your algorithm, keying off of only a
> single Author name.  A number of us have aliases, modifying your query to
> use email seems to yield different results.
>

Disregard, this is an error on my part.

>
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130405/4e81356d/attachment.html>