Open Stack

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hey!
>
> On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 11:01 -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > I know everyone loves looking at numbers around this time. I'm sure
> > there will be several new reports on which people or companies did the
> > most. I wanted to poke at a slightly different thing - which is overall
> > combined community effort.
> >
> >                       Essex   Folsom  Grizzly
> > Patches Uploaded      11036   17986   29308
> > Changes Created               5137    5990    12721
> > Changes Landed                4235    4978    10561
> > Avg patches per Change        2.6     3.6     2.7
> > Landing Percentage    82%     83%     83%
> >
> > Clearly our velocity continues to increase, which is great. Something
> > happened during folsom to cause us to need to on-average iterate more to
> > get a change landed, but then we corrected the ship during grizzly. I'm
> > more fascinated by the fact that our percentage of changes created to
> > changes landed is holding extremely steady.
> >
> > Great work at managing the firehose everybody!
>
> Indeed, those are amazing stats! Nice one Monty.
>
> I sent out gitdm based "Who wrote Essex/Folsom" stats in previous
> releases:
>
>   https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg09650.html
>   https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg17006.html
>
> and I've done them again for Grizzly:
>
>
> https://github.com/markmc/openstack-gitdm/blob/results/grizzly/git-stats.txt
>
> Frankly, though, I'm losing faith in this "number of commits" statistic
> being all that useful. Most of my commits were probably trivial cfg
> cleanups in Nova.
>
> Also, bitergia's stats are getting more and more comprehensive:
>
>
> http://blog.bitergia.com/2013/04/04/companies-contributing-to-openstack-grizzly-analysis/
>
> So ... consider openstack-gitdm orphaned and open to a new
> maintainer :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Mark.
>
> FWIW there seems to be a bug in your algorithm, keying off of only a
single Author name.  A number of us have aliases, modifying your query to
use email seems to yield different results.


>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130405/725f9769/attachment.html>