<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Mark McLoughlin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:markmc@redhat.com" target="_blank">markmc@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hey!<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 11:01 -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:<br>
> I know everyone loves looking at numbers around this time. I'm sure<br>
> there will be several new reports on which people or companies did the<br>
> most. I wanted to poke at a slightly different thing - which is overall<br>
> combined community effort.<br>
><br>
> Essex Folsom Grizzly<br>
> Patches Uploaded 11036 17986 29308<br>
> Changes Created 5137 5990 12721<br>
> Changes Landed 4235 4978 10561<br>
> Avg patches per Change 2.6 3.6 2.7<br>
> Landing Percentage 82% 83% 83%<br>
><br>
> Clearly our velocity continues to increase, which is great. Something<br>
> happened during folsom to cause us to need to on-average iterate more to<br>
> get a change landed, but then we corrected the ship during grizzly. I'm<br>
> more fascinated by the fact that our percentage of changes created to<br>
> changes landed is holding extremely steady.<br>
><br>
> Great work at managing the firehose everybody!<br>
<br>
</div>Indeed, those are amazing stats! Nice one Monty.<br>
<br>
I sent out gitdm based "Who wrote Essex/Folsom" stats in previous<br>
releases:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg09650.html" target="_blank">https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg09650.html</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg17006.html" target="_blank">https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg17006.html</a><br>
<br>
and I've done them again for Grizzly:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://github.com/markmc/openstack-gitdm/blob/results/grizzly/git-stats.txt" target="_blank">https://github.com/markmc/openstack-gitdm/blob/results/grizzly/git-stats.txt</a><br>
<br>
Frankly, though, I'm losing faith in this "number of commits" statistic<br>
being all that useful. Most of my commits were probably trivial cfg<br>
cleanups in Nova.<br>
<br>
Also, bitergia's stats are getting more and more comprehensive:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://blog.bitergia.com/2013/04/04/companies-contributing-to-openstack-grizzly-analysis/" target="_blank">http://blog.bitergia.com/2013/04/04/companies-contributing-to-openstack-grizzly-analysis/</a><br>
<br>
So ... consider openstack-gitdm orphaned and open to a new<br>
maintainer :-)<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Mark.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div>FWIW there seems to be a bug in your algorithm, keying off of only a single Author name. A number of us have aliases, modifying your query to use email seems to yield different results. </div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>