[legal-discuss] docs licenses: current state and desired state
rfontana at redhat.com
Tue Mar 24 21:58:55 UTC 2015
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:34:13PM -0500, Anne Gentle wrote:
> On guides where the output doesn't indicate a license but the source does; is
> that sufficient?
It might not be required but it seems preferable to have an indication
of the license in the output too. Or at least some general statement
about how guides are licensed by default, e.g. at docs.openstack.org
or perhaps via the web page footer.
More information about the legal-discuss