- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

Search for openstack cloud billing dataset
by Daniella kalimumbalo 10 Oct '22

10 Oct '22

Openstack can monitor and bill the cloud users according to their resources consumption. I'm looking for a dataset for resources usage in an openstack cloud infrastructure, that contains the resources consumption metrics and bill of each end-user. That dataset will allow me to work on price prediction of cloud ressources using machine/ Deep learning.Please is it possible to get it?

2 1

Re: Kroxvx rsvxfzwql
by Jeremy Stanley 10 Oct '22

10 Oct '22

The previous message in this thread was spoofed to appear to originate from one of the list subscribers in order to get around our moderation mechanism. Normally the attachments on these sorts of messages are too large to make it through without being held for moderator review, but this one was just small enough to make it onto the list. I've scrubbed the attachment from the archives for safety and set up the listserv to strip "zip" attachments from future posts (since it now seems to be a popular vector for distributing Windows malware by E-mail), but if anyone received the original I strongly recommend not opening it. -- Jeremy Stanley

1 0

[Ceilometer] Pollster cannot get RadosGW metrics when API endpoints are based on URL instead of port number
by Taltavull Jean-François 10 Oct '22

10 Oct '22

Hi All, In our OpenStack deployment, API endpoints are defined by using URLs instead of port numbers and HAProxy forwards requests to the right bakend after having ACLed the URL. In the case of our object-store service, based on RadosGW, the internal API endpoint is "https://<FQDN>/object-store/swift/v1/AUTH_<tenant_id>" When Ceilometer RadosGW pollster tries to connect to the RadosGW admin API with the object-store internal endpoint, the URL becomes https://<FQDN>/admin, as shown by HAProxy logs. This URL does not match any API endpoint from HAProxy point of view. The line of code that rewrites the URL is this one: https://opendev.org/openstack/ceilometer/src/branch/stable/wallaby/ceilomet… What would you think of adding a mechanism based on new Ceilometer configuration option(s) to control the URL rewriting ? Our deployment characteristics: - OpenStack release: Wallaby - Ceph and RadosGW version: 15.2.16 - deployment tool: OSA 23.2.1 and ceph-ansible Best regards, Jean-Francois

2 23

Failed to create user port error
by Lajos Katona 10 Oct '22

10 Oct '22

(Resending it without the attached picture) Hi, It seems more a Neutron exception, and my 1st thought is to check your subnet and add it to your router, you can do it manually with openstack CLI: openstack router add subnet <router name/id> 98a65c6e-2473-48f1-a578-702a08649c73 Not sure if it is possible if you use trove as I never used it. Best wishes Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)

1 0

Kroxvx rsvxfzwql
by nobody 09 Oct '22

09 Oct '22

This message has been removed.

1 0

Failed to create user port error
by Monish Selvaraj 07 Oct '22

07 Oct '22

Hi, Iam recently enabled trove in our kolla-ansible openstack. I can't create an instance in trove. It seems *Failed to create User port for instance 54ab3ff2-ecec-4b22-a736-3c36972542e3: Subnet 98a65c6e-2473-48f1-a578-702a08649c73 is not associated with router.* Also added the following parameter in trove.conf and restarted the docker container. But it's not working. [network] enable_access_check = False [image: image.png]

1 0

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 2022 Oct 7: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 07 Oct '22

07 Oct '22

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * We had this week's meeting on Oct 6. Most of the meeting discussions are summarized in this email. Meeting recording is present @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhL67mf4uAY&t=464s and summary logs are available @ https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-10-06-15.00.log.html * Next TC weekly meeting will be a video call on Oct 13 Thursday at 15:00 UTC, feel free to add the topic on the agenda[1] by Oct 12. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * Dedicated Zed release to Ilya Etingof[2] * Selected Ghanshyam as chair [3] 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Zed cycle ------------------------------ * Zed tracker etherpad includes the TC working items[4], Five are completed and other items are in-progress. Open Reviews ----------------- * Six open reviews for ongoing activities[5]. New community-wide goal "Migration CI/CD to Ubuntu 22.04" -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dmitriy proposed to select this goal for 2023.1 cycle [6]. 2023.1 cycle Leaderless projects & TC Chair ---------------------------------------------------- * Zun project PTL appointment is under review[7][8]. * Slaweq volunteer to serve as Vice chair[9]. 2023.1 cycle TC PTG planning ------------------------------------ * Etherpads to add the topics: ** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023-1-ptg ** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-leaders-interaction-2023-1 * I sent an email about the 'Operator Hours' slots in this PTG, please check and reserve the operator hour slot for your project[10] 2021 User Survey TC Question Analysis ----------------------------------------------- No update on this. The survey summary is up for review[11]. Feel free to check and provide feedback. Fixing Zuul config error ---------------------------- We request projects having zuul config error to fix them, Keep supported stable branches as priority and Extended maintenance stable branch as low priority[12][13]. Project updates ------------------- * None. 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[14]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [15] 3. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/859464 [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/858957 [4] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-tracker [5] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/860040 [7] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/858980 [8] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/860759 [9] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/860352 [10] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/0303… [11] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/836888 [12] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/0305… [13] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zuul-config-error-openstack [14] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [15] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting -gmann

1 0

[horizon] Antelope PTG Schedule
by vishal manchanda 07 Oct '22

07 Oct '22

Hello Team, Please Find the Schedule for Horizon PTG in the eherpad [1]. Feel Free to add the topics you want to discuss in the PTG. Don't forget to register for PTG, if not done yet [2]. See you at the PTG! Thanks & Regards, Vishal Manchanda (irc: vishalmanchanda) [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-antelope-ptg [2] https://openinfra-ptg.eventbrite.com/

1 0

[neutron] Drivers meeting agenda -06.10.2022.
by Lajos Katona 06 Oct '22

06 Oct '22

Hi Neutron Drivers, The agenda for tomorrow's drivers meeting is at [1]. We have the following RFE to discuss: [RFE] Strict minimum bandwidth support for tunnelled networks (#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1991965 ) [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers#Agenda See you at the meeting tomorrow. Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)

1 0

[neutron][tempest][all] Broken CI, any job inherited from "devstack"
by Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez 06 Oct '22

06 Oct '22

Hello all: I broke the OpenStack CI (good start as Neutron PTL). I pushed [1] testing only against the Neutron CI. After making the needed changes [2], I thought any other job would be safe. I've opened [3]. The default OVN version installed in the CI, using Ubuntu 20.04, is v20.03, that is a bit old. I've proposed to bump to v21.06, extensively tested in the Neutron CI. Any tempest job from any project is inherited from this one. Once we have migrated to Ubuntu 22.04 during this cycle, we'll remove this forced OVN installation from source. Regards. [1]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/859642 [2]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/860078/ [3]https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1991952 [4]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/860577

5 8