February 2022 - openstack-discuss

[all] Dynamic Zuul results table in Gerrit 3
by Radosław Piliszek 04 Aug '22

04 Aug '22

Hello Fellow OpenStack and OpenDev Folks! TL;DR click on [3] and enjoy. I am starting this thread to not hijack the discussion happening on [1]. First of all, I would like to thank gibi (Balazs Gibizer) for hacking a way to get the place to render the table in the first place (pun intended). I have been a long-time-now user of [2]. I have improved and customised it for myself but never really got to share back the changes I made. The new Gerrit obviously broke the whole script so it was of no use to share at that particular state. However, inspired by gibi's work, I decided to finally sit down and fix it to work with Gerrit 3 and here it comes: [3]. Works well on Chrome with Tampermonkey. Not tested others. I hope you will enjoy this little helper (I do). I know the script looks super fugly but it generally boils down to a mix of styles of 3 people and Gerrit having funky UI rendering. Finally, I'd also like to thank hrw (Marcin Juszkiewicz) for linking me to the original Michel's script in 2019. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/019051… [2] https://opendev.org/x/coats/src/commit/444c95738677593dcfed0cfd9667d4c4f0d5… [3] https://gist.github.com/yoctozepto/7ea1271c299d143388b7c1b1802ee75e Kind regards, -yoctozepto

5 7

[all] PyCharm Licenses Renewed till July 2021
by Swapnil Kulkarni 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

Hello, Happy to inform you the open source developer license for Pycharm has been renewed for 1 additional year till July 2021. Best Regards, Swapnil Kulkarni coolsvap at gmail dot com

8 13

Nova not updating to new size of an extended in-use / attached cinder volume (Ceph RBD) to guest
by Christian Rohmann 28 Jun '22

28 Jun '22

Hello Openstack-Discuss, after some digging I found out that cinder learned to resize attached (in-use) volumes quite a while ago with the introduction of the initial "extend 'in-use' volume" feature: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/454287/ The support was then extended to also cover Ceph RBD backed volumes with: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/613039/ Since this is only about the cinder part, I was wondering if nova would ever find out and would actively rescan the device / volume and quintessentially present an increased new size to the guest. Apparently this is where a certain volume-extended event comes into play: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/454322/ that is to be emitted by cinder when a volume had been extened. I then went head and tried this with the openstack cli (as Horizon does not seem to support / offer to resize in-use volumes. I run Openstack Train with Ceph RBD as storage. First I ran into an issue with the openstack cli (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1871759/comments/2 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1871759/comments/2>) but using cinder extend $volumeid $newsize I was able to resize in-use volumes just fine. The only thing missing was the propagation to the guest. I played around with SCSI rescans, but that did not work, reboots also failed to do anyting in this regards. Stopping and starting the VM did work, but why having the capability to online-resize an attached volume when not being able to resize the guest volume as well? Apparently there seems to be an old and somewhat similar observation / bug with https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1369465 So I was simply wondering if this is expected to be working? Are there any special settings / options I need to set to enable this feature? Thanks and with kind regards Christian

4 9

[oslo] Propose to EOL stable/queens, stable/rocky on all the oslo scope
by Herve Beraud 24 Jun '22

24 Jun '22

Hi, On our last meeting of the oslo team we discussed the problem with broken stable branches (rocky and older) in oslo's projects [1]. Indeed, almost all these branches are broken. Előd Illés kindly generated a list of periodic-stable errors on Oslo's stable branches [2]. Given the lack of active maintainers on Oslo and given the current status of the CI in those branches, I propose to make them End Of Life. I will wait until the end of month for anyone who would like to maybe step up as maintainer of those branches and who would at least try to fix CI of them. If no one will volunteer for that, I'll EOLing those branches for all the projects under the oslo umbrella. Let us know your thoughts. Thank you for your attention. [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-10-04-15.00.log.t… [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-July/023939.html -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud

5 5

[api=sig][i18n][infra][tc] Cleaning up more defunct mailing lists
by Jeremy Stanley 04 May '22

04 May '22

A quick audit of the mailing lists we host at lists.openstack.org turned up the following 11 which have had no new posts for at least three years now: * openstack-api-consumers * openstack-de * openstack-el * openstack-i18n-fr * openstack-ir * openstack-personas * openstack-ru * openstack-sos * openstack-tw * openstack-vi * third-party-announce I'd like to clean them up by removing their list configurations, but leaving any public archives intact. Are there any objections? Should any of the above have future messages redirected to a different list (though since they haven't had any for years, that's probably unnecessary)? -- Jeremy Stanley

5 8

[neutron] Bug Deputy Report January 03 - 10
by Lucas Alvares Gomes 11 Apr '22

11 Apr '22

Hi, This is the Neutron bug report from January 3rd to 10th. Critical: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956344 - "Functional test test_gateway_chassis_rebalance is failing intermittently" - Assigned to: Rodolfo Alonso High: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956034 - "ovn load balancer health monitor cause mac address conflict" - Unassigned * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956745 - " [ovn-octavia-provider] Load Balancer remained with ACTIVE state even with PENDING_UPDATE listener" - Assigned to: Luis Tomas Bolivar * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956763 - "[OVN] Overlapping configuration for security group logging is not applied correctly" - Assigned to: Elvira Garcia Ruiz Medium: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956035 - "ovn load balancer member failover not working when accessed from floating ip" - Unassigned * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956632 - "DNS integration documentation and scenario tests need update after dns_assignment calculation was changed" - Assigned to: Miguel Lavalle * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956785 - "Duplicate validator TypeError for dict values Edit" - Assigned to: Harald Jensås Low: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956476 - "[OVN] Disallow multiple physnets per bridge" - Assigned to: Rodolfo Alonso * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956770 - " keepalived no_track implemented in >= 2.0.3" - Assigned to: Rodolfo Alonso Needs further triage: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956435 - "OVS: support multiple segments per host" - Unassigned * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956460 - "The VM can't get metadata from dhcp-agent" - Unassigned * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1956846 - "ha router duplicated routes" - Unassigned Cheers, Lucas

4 7

Xena and CEPH RBD backend (show_image_direct_url status )
by west, andrew 09 Apr '22

09 Apr '22

Hello experts Currently using openstack Xena and Ceph backend (Pacific 16.2.7) It seems there is a bug (since Wallaby?) where the efficient use of a CEPH Pacific RBD backend (i.e with copy-on-write-cloning) is not working . Show_image_direct_url needs to be False to create volumes (or ephemeral volumes for nova) This can of course be tremendously slow (Nova , ephemeral root disk) without copy-on-write cloning feature of Ceph. As Ceph RBD is THE most favourite backend for block storage in openstack I am wondering how others are coping (or workarounds found ?) Which combinations of Openstack and Ceph are known to work well with copy-on-write-cloning? How is the noted GRAVE Security RISK of enabling Show_image_direct_url mitigated ? (i.e I think , for CEPH RBD, it needs to be True to get cloning to work efficiently) See another report of this issue here: Re: Ceph Pacifif and Openstack Wallaby - ERROR cinder.scheduler.flows.create_volume - CEPH Filesystem Users (spinics.net)<https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg66016.html> Thanks for any help or pointers, Andrew West Openstack consulting CGG France ________________________________ "This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the email by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, disclose, copy, distribute or use this e-mail; please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately."

7 9

[all][tc] Zed TC-PTG Planning
by Ghanshyam Mann 01 Apr '22

01 Apr '22

Hello Everyone, As you already know that the Zed cycle virtual PTG will be held between 4th - 8th April[1]. I have started the preparation for the Technical Committee PTG sessions. Please do the following: 1. Fill the below doodle poll as per your availability. Please fill it in soon as the deadline to book the slot is March 11th. - https://doodle.com/poll/gz4dy67vmew5wmn9 2. Add the topics you would like to discuss to the below etherpad. - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-ptg NOTE: this is not limited to TC members only; I would like all community members to fill the doodle poll and, add the topics you would like or want TC members to discuss in PTG. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-February/027051… -gmann

1 2

[TripleO] Core team cleanup
by James Slagle 30 Mar '22

30 Mar '22

Hello, I took a look at our core team, "tripleo-core" in gerrit. We have a few individuals who I feel have moved on from TripleO in their focus. I looked at the reviews from stackalytics.io for the last 180 days[1]. These individuals have less than 6 reviews, which is about 1 review a month: Bob Fournier Dan Sneddon Dmitry Tantsur Jiří Stránský Juan Antonio Osorio Robles Marius Cornea These individuals have publicly expressed that they are moving on from TripleO: Michele Baldessari wes hayutin I'd like to propose we remove these folks from our core team, while thanking them for their contributions. I'll also note that I'd still value +1/-1 from these folks with a lot of significance, and encourage them to review their areas of expertise! If anyone on the list plans to start reviewing in TripleO again, then I also think we can postpone the removal for the time being and re-evaluate later. Please let me know if that's the case. Please reply and let me know any agreements or concerns with this change. Thank you! [1] https://www.stackalytics.io/report/contribution?module=tripleo-group&projec… -- -- James Slagle --

5 6

[tc][release] Removing TC tags framework - next steps for release notes
by Radosław Piliszek 15 Mar '22

15 Mar '22

Hello Release Team, As you might have heard, the TC is removing the TC tags framework. [1] The first step has already been proposed and is being voted on. [2] The removal of certain parts seems to be affecting the release team tooling, especially with the usage of the stable:follows-policy tag to show a relevant banner. [3] The proposed change purposely avoids breaking the releases repo and awaits a "part 2" which cleans up everything TC-tags-framework-related. Thus, I am asking for your help to remove this dependency on the tags framework. I understand there might be several approaches to this and need your assistance to continue. The simplest approach is to drop the relevant code - assuming it is not actively used for release process purposes. Obviously, for anything else I need your input on what the options are. It is also possible that you would prefer to port this tag to your internal metadata. I am open to ideas and will help enact the changes. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025554.… [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/822900 [3] https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/commit/768a12e233c23999db18c807c… Kind regards, -yoctozepto

3 4

[infra] gerrit is:mergeable predicate
by Brian Rosmaita 15 Mar '22

15 Mar '22

Hello Infra team, In Gerrit 3.4, the is:mergeable predicate is disabled by default [0]. It was kind of handy to be able to screen out patches that are in merge conflict when looking for reviews. Is there an alternative way of doing this, or would you be averse to restoring the previous behavior? (I promise not to complain about gerrit performance.) cheers, brian [0] https://www.gerritcodereview.com/3.4.html#ismergeable-predicate-is-disabled…

2 3

[Neutron][Octavia][ovn-octavia-provider] proposing Luis Tomas Bolivar for ovn-octavia-provider core reviewer
by Lajos Katona 09 Mar '22

09 Mar '22

Hi I would like to propose Luis Tomas Bolivar (ltomasbo) as a core reviewer to the ovn-octavia-provider project. Luis is very active in the project (see [1] and [2]) and has experience with Kuryr side also which uses ovn-octavia-provider. As ovn-octavia-provider is a link between Neutron and Octavia I ask both Neutron and Octavia cores to vote by answering to this thread, to have a final decision. Thanks for your consideration [1]: https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:ltomasbo%2540redhat.com+branch:master [2]: https://www.stackalytics.io/report/contribution?module=neutron-group&projec… Cheers Lajos

8 8

[Triple0] Upgrade Error
by Lokendra Rathour 05 Mar '22

05 Mar '22

Hi Team, we are trying to upgrade Triple0 Train to Ussuri. Undercloud upgrade prepare is done successfully and when we are going for overcloud upgrade getting below error: * len(inspect.getargspec(type_).args) > 1)2022-02-23 16:49:50.959 187217 INFO tripleoclient.utils.utils [-] Running Ansible playbook: /usr/share/ansible/tripleo-playbooks/cli-update-params.yaml, Working directory: /tmp/tripleoj7rvp51m, Playbook directory: /usr/share/ansible/tripleo-playbooksPLAY [Update Parameters] *******************************************************2022-02-23 16:49:51.858966 | 5254007d-0040-f631-88e7-000000000008 | TASK | Check for required inputs2022-02-23 16:49:51.895961 | 5254007d-0040-f631-88e7-000000000008 | SKIPPED | Check for required inputs | localhost2022-02-23 16:49:51.897803 | 5254007d-0040-f631-88e7-000000000008 | TIMING | Check for required inputs | localhost | 0:00:00.096595 | 0.04s2022-02-23 16:49:51.901827 | 5254007d-0040-f631-88e7-000000000009 | TASK | Set parameters fact2022-02-23 16:49:51.949091 | 5254007d-0040-f631-88e7-000000000009 | OK | Set parameters fact | localhost2022-02-23 16:49:51.951583 | 5254007d-0040-f631-88e7-000000000009 | TIMING | Set parameters fact | localhost | 0:00:00.150375 | 0.05s2022-02-23 16:49:51.956146 | 5254007d-0040-f631-88e7-00000000000b | TASK | Update parameters2022-02-23 16:50:12.542028 | 5254007d-0040-f631-88e7-00000000000b | FATAL | Update parameters | localhost | error={"changed": false, "error": "Error validating environment for plan overcloud: ERROR: Property error: resources.InternalApiVirtualIP.properties: Unknown Property DnsName\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/common/wsgi.py\", line 891, in __call__\n request, **action_args)\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/common/wsgi.py\", line 964, in dispatch\n return method(*args, **kwargs)\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/api/openstack/v1/util.py\", line 56, in handle_stack_method\n return handler(controller, req, **kwargs)\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/api/openstack/v1/stacks.py\", line 633, in validate_template\n raise exc.HTTPBadRequest(result['Error'])\n", "msg": "Error updating parameters for plan overcloud: Error validating environment for plan overcloud: ERROR: Property error: resources.InternalApiVirtualIP.properties: Unknown Property DnsName\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/common/wsgi.py\", line 891, in __call__\n request, **action_args)\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/common/wsgi.py\", line 964, in dispatch\n return method(*args, **kwargs)\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/api/openstack/v1/util.py\", line 56, in handle_stack_method\n return handler(controller, req, **kwargs)\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/heat/api/openstack/v1/stacks.py\", line 633, in validate_template\n raise exc.HTTPBadRequest(result['Error'])\n", "success": false}2022-02-23 16:50:12.544560 | 5254007d-0040-f631-88e7-00000000000b | TIMING | Update parameters | localhost | 0:00:20.743350 | 20.59s* Command used to run the overcloud upgrade prepare: *(undercloud) [stack@undercloud ~]$ cat upgrade_overcloud_prepare.shopenstack overcloud upgrade prepare --templates \ -r /home/stack/templates/roles_data.yaml \ -n /home/stack/templates/network_data.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/environment.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/environments/network-isolation.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/environments/network-environment.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/services/ironic-conductor.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/services/ironic-inspector.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/services/ironic-overcloud.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/ironic-config.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/docker-ha.yaml \ -e /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/environments/podman.yaml \ -e /home/stack/templates/init-repo.yaml \ -e /home/stack/containers-prepare-parameter.yaml(undercloud) [stack@undercloud ~]$* *Document referred:*Upgrading to a Next Major Release — TripleO 3.0.0 documentation (openstack.org) <https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/wallaby/post_d…> Any support here, please. -- ~ Lokendra skype: lokendrarathour

2 5

[tc][ptl] TC + Community Leaders interaction in Zed Virtual PTG
by Ghanshyam Mann 04 Mar '22

04 Mar '22

Hello Everyone, We had successful TC+Community leaders interaction sessions in the last PTG, and we will continue the same for Zed cycle PTG also. I have created the below etherpad with the draft agenda, If you as PTL or project representatives or SIG Chair and would like to attend this session, please add your name: - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-ptl-interaction-zed Also, I have created the doodle poll to select the best suitable time. It will be for two hours (single or two sessions) either on Monday or Tuesday. Please add your preference in the below doodle poll (including TC members): - https://doodle.com/poll/dcer6i3wk2b8eim3 -gmann

1 1

[Ironic] No suitable device was found for deployment
by 韩光宇 04 Mar '22

04 Mar '22

Dear all, I have a OpenStack Victoria environment, and tried to use ironic manage bare metal. But I got "- root device hints were not provided and all found block devices are smaller than 4294967296B." in deploy stage. 2022-02-09 17:57:56.492 3908982 ERROR ironic.drivers.modules.agent_base [-] Agent returned error for deploy step {'step': 'write_image', 'priority': 80, 'argsinfo': None, 'interface': 'deploy'} on node cc68c450-ce54-4e1c-be04-8b0a6169ef92 : No suitable device was found for deployment - root device hints were not provided and all found block devices are smaller than 4294967296B.. I used "openstack server create --flavor my-baremetal-flavor --nic net-id=$net_id --image $image testing" to deploy bare metal node. I download deploy images(ipa-centos8-master.kernel and ipa-centos8-master.initramfs) in https://tarballs.opendev.org/openstack/ironic-python-agent/dib/files/. The baremetal node info and flavor info as following: https://paste.opendev.org/show/bV7lgO6RkNQY6ZGPbT2e/ Ironic configure file as following: https://paste.opendev.org/show/bTgY9Kpn7KWqwQl73aEa/ Ironic-conductor log: https://paste.opendev.org/show/bFKZYlXmccxNxU8lEogk/ The log of ironic-python-agent in bare metal node: https://paste.opendev.org/show/btAuaMuV2IutV2Pa7YIa/ I see some old discussion about this, such as: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312187. But those discussions took place a long time ago, not version V, and no solution was seen. Does anyone know how to solve this problem? I would appreciate any kind of guidance or help. Thank you, Han Guangyu

3 14

[Devstack][Gnocchi][Ceilometer] Not able to retrieve metrics using ceilometer and gnocchi
by Molka Gharbaoui 03 Mar '22

03 Mar '22

Hi all, I installed devstack and ceilometer by adding the following lines in the local.conf file: enable_plugin ceilometer https://opendev.org/openstack/ceilometer.git CEILOMETER_BACKEND=gnocchi Devstack (yoga) works correctly (I am able to create images, instances, etc.). The problem is that I cannot visualize the metrics. Using "gnocchi metric list" and "gnocchi resource list" commands the result is empty. When I use the "--debug" option, no errors are plotted but the body response is empty. "ceilometer-upgrade" gives the following error: DEBUG ceilometer.cmd.storage Upgrade Gnocchi resource types upgrade /opt/stack/ceilometer/ceilometer/cmd/storage.py:42 "ceilometer-polling" prints "The resource could not be found". I have a running instance. Could you help me in retrieving the metrics from openstack?

3 5

[hwsig] sushy-oem-idrac for Hardware Vendor SIG
by Jaunteva, Aija 03 Mar '22

03 Mar '22

Hi, I would like to propose moving sushy-oem-idrac [1] that is used in Ironic project to Hardware Vendor SIG. sushy-oem-idrac is iDRAC specific OEM extension of vendor-independent sushy [2] library and both use Redfish to communicate with BMCs. Any feedback welcome. Regards, Aija [1] https://opendev.org/x/sushy-oem-idrac/ [2] https://opendev.org/openstack/sushy Internal Use - Confidential

2 1

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on Mar 4th at 1500 UTC
by Ghanshyam Mann 02 Mar '22

02 Mar '22

Hello Everyone, Technical Committee's next weekly meeting is scheduled for Mar 4th at 1500 UTC. If you would like to add topics for discussion, please add them to the below wiki page by Wednesday, Mar 3rd, at 2100 UTC. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting -gmann

1 2

[election][heat][ptl] PTL non-candidacy
by Rico Lin 02 Mar '22

02 Mar '22

Hi all, As the PTL election will soon start, I would like to share my statement on not planning to run another term of Heat PTL. And Instead, I encourage anyone (core reviewer or not) who is interested to put their name on. I will definitely still stay around and help with reviews and patches. cheers, *Rico Lin*

4 3

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: Mar 2nd, 15utc
by Thierry Carrez 02 Mar '22

02 Mar '22

Hi everyone, The Large Scale SIG will be meeting this Wednesday in #openstack-operators on OFTC IRC, at 15UTC. You can doublecheck how that time translates locally at: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20220302T15 Feel free to add topics to the agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting Regards, -- Thierry Carrez

1 1

[TripleO] centos9 jobs only for master, centos 8 & 9 for wallaby
by Marios Andreou 02 Mar '22

02 Mar '22

Hello TripleO o/ During the last period the tripleo-ci team has been working on getting tripleo CI jobs to run centos-9. On master branches across all TripleO repos we now run C9 exclusively (since [1]). On Wallaby branches, after the work at [2] (in particular after https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/830132 merges) we will run both C8 and C9 jobs. I started an etherpad at [3] thinking this would be a PTG topic, but I think we'll want to have this conversation way before then. There is a tripleo-heat-templates example in the etherpad that shows what we can expect from the job runs (note the exact jobs that run will vary per repo and even between changes depending on the files touched - but generally there will be duplication between 8 and 9 jobs). The current proposal is that we keep a minimal subset on C8 Wallaby, with C9 wallaby having the full set of jobs. Two factors that will affect our decisions are (there may be more?) i) Upgrades requirements - are we supporting upgrading to Wallaby on 8? For example, the coming undercloud-upgrade-ffu job will be train 8 to wallaby 8. In which case we definitely need to keep at least some subset of 8 jobs (and can't entertain the removal of 8 from Wallaby completely). ii) Are we importing from Wallaby 8 or Wallaby 9? Currently it is 8 but this will soon switch. For the wallaby c8 'subset of jobs' e.g. multinode, vanilla standalone (no scenarios? some subset of them?), undercloud-ffu, minor update. This is just to start the conversation so please reply if you have thoughts or comments about any of the above. We are planning to discuss this in the coming tripleo-ci community call this coming Tuesday at 1330 UTC - meeting link at [4] so please join us if you can and would like to participate, regards, marios [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:c8_teardown_master [2] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:c9_wallaby_gates [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tripleoci-wallaby-centos-8-9 [4] https://meet.google.com/bqx-xwht-wky

4 7

[horizon][customization]
by Mathilde Hermet 02 Mar '22

02 Mar '22

Hello Openstack team, I'm currently working on customizing the Horizon (xena) dashboard to use the OVHcloud assets: logo.svg and logo-splash.svg. I've been following this documentation https://docs.openstack.org/horizon/latest/configuration/themes.html I added the ovhcloud theme in horizon/openstack_dashboard/local/local_settings.py in AVAILABLE_THEMES, I created the subdir ovhcloud in horizon/openstack_dashboard/themes and I created a ovhcloud/img with logo.svg and logo-splash.svg in it. I put a _variables.scss and a _styles.scss in /themes/ovhcloud/ Then I executed python manage.py collectstatic It put all the files in horizon-sources/horizon.../static/themes/ovhcloud But then when trying to connect with the session cookie theme="ovhcloud", I have a 500 error. i don't think it comes from images because i've been puting it in /horizon-souurces/horizon.../static/dashbaord.img and they were displayed correctly. Do you have any idea about the misconfiguration I've done ? Best regards, Mathilde Hermet

4 3

[nova][octavia][masakari][designate][oslo][requirements] oslo.context>=4.0.0 seems to need updated tests
by Matthew Thode 01 Mar '22

01 Mar '22

The update to see what's breaking is here https://review.opendev.org/829599 Feel free to make that patch depend on your fix to test (with rechecks) -- Matthew Thode

4 6

Fluentd error with Kolla ansible deployment
by A Monster 28 Feb '22

28 Feb '22

I'm getting the following error while trying to deploy openstack using kolla-ansible. I've set up a local docker registry and enabled insecure registries in daemon.json file and I even tried to pull fluentd docker image but I still get the following error TASK [common : Ensure fluentd image is present for label check] fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"changed": true, "msg": "'Traceback (most recent call last):\\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/docker/api/client.py\", line 268, in _raise_for_status\\n response.raise_for_status()\\n File \"/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/requests/models.py\", line 940, in raise_for_status\\n raise HTTPError(http_error_msg, response=self)\\nrequests.exceptions.HTTPError: 500 Server Error: Internal Server Error for url: http+docker://localhost/v1.41/images/create?tag=xena&fromImage=quay.io%2Fkolla%2Fcentos-source-fluentd\\n\\nDuring handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:\\n\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n File \"/tmp/ansible_kolla_docker_payload_xizndx9s/ansible_kolla_docker_payload.zip/ansible/modules/kolla_docker.py\", line 1241, in main\\n File \"/tmp/ansible_kolla_docker_payload_xizndx9s/ansible_kolla_docker_payload.zip/ansible/modules/kolla_docker.py\", line 1116, in ensure_image\\n File \"/tmp/ansible_kolla_docker_payload_xizndx9s/ansible_kolla_docker_payload.zip/ansible/modules/kolla_docker.py\", line 692, in pull_image\\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/docker/api/image.py\", line 430, in pull\\n self._raise_for_status(response)\\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/docker/api/client.py\", line 270, in _raise_for_status\\n raise create_api_error_from_http_exception(e)\\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/docker/errors.py\", line 31, in create_api_error_from_http_exception\\n raise cls(e, response=response, explanation=explanation)\\ndocker.errors.APIError: 500 Server Error for http+docker://localhost/v1.41/images/create?tag=xena&fromImage=quay.io%2Fkolla%2Fcentos-source-fluentd: Internal Server Error (\"unauthorized: access to the requested resource is not authorized\")\\n'"}

2 2

[qa][devstack] Proposing Dan Smith to devstack core
by Martin Kopec 28 Feb '22

28 Feb '22

Hi all, we would like to propose Dan Smith (IRC: dansmith) to devstack core. Dan is an experienced contributor who has been contributing to several openstack projects. We are glad Dan volunteered to help us in the Devstack project as well. You can vote/feedback in this email thread. If no objection by 17th of February, we will add Dan to the core list. Thanks, -- Martin Kopec Senior Software Quality Engineer Red Hat EMEA IM: kopecmartin

3 3

[cinder] Yoga FEATURE FREEZE in effect
by Harsha Ailani 28 Feb '22

28 Feb '22

Hello Argonauts, Having passed Milestone-3 this week (and yes, it was painful), let's evaluate where we are with cinder Yoga features: - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/yoga Note: You must apply for a Feature Freeze Exception (FFE) by 17:00 UTC on Tuesday 1 March. Features granted an FFE must be in the gate by 20:00 UTC on Monday 7 March. Being granted an FFE is not a guarantee that your feature will be included in Yoga. FFE Details: ------------------ ibm-svf-portset - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/ibm-svf-portset - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/817351 - no +2s because third-party CI isn't passing - let's face it, no one is going to review this with failing CI even if it gets an FFE - must apply for an FFE The Third-Party CI for this review is IBM Storage CI. As the storage was done last week the CI failed. But today Zuul and IBM Storage CI both passed successfully. The portset has been tested throughly and reviewed by several reviewers in the last 2 months. All the comments are addressed and tested. The review has received a +2 from Rajat and +1 from Eric and Brian. The review is ready to be merged. Thanks and Regards, Harsh Ailani

2 1

[PTLs][release] Yoga Cycle Highligts
by Előd Illés 28 Feb '22

28 Feb '22

Hi, This is a reminder, that *this week* is the week for Cycle highlights [1][2]! They need to be added to deliverable yamls so that they can be included in release marketing preparations. (See the details about how to add them at the project team guide [3].) [1] https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html [2] https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-cycle-highlights [3] https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#cycle… Thanks, Előd Illés irc: elodilles

2 1

[neutron] Bug deputy report for week of 21. 02. 2022
by Lajos Katona 28 Feb '22

28 Feb '22

Hi Neutron Team I was bug deputy in neutron last week. It was a very quiet week again. Needs More attention ================= * Duplicate IP address on LSPs in the same LS lead to unpredictable flow output (https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1961046 ) * [ovn-octavia-provider] OVN NB DB timeouts ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1961874 ) ** perhaps not Neutron related, but more a pkg version problem. Critical ====== * Network interface not found in namespace https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1961740 ** In progress: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/830622 High ==== * Transition to SQLAlchemy 2.0 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1962153) * [Prefix Delegation] router add segment fails with Subnet for router interface must have a gateway IP ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1962306 ) * [ntp] "test_network_attached_with_two_routers" randomly failing ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1962167) ** In progress: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/830813 Low ==== * There may be a typo in the neutron document whose the title is 'Manual install & Configuration' (https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1962324) Invalid ====== * generate_config_file_samples.sh fails with invalid literal for int() with base 10 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1961906) Regards Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)

1 0

[ops][nova] How to update from N to N+3 (and manage nova services that don't start because they find too old compute nodes...)
by Massimo Sgaravatto 28 Feb '22

28 Feb '22

Dear all When we upgraded our Cloud from Rocky to Train we followed the following procedure: 1) Shutdown of all services on the controller and compute nodes 2) Update from Rocky to Stein of controller (just to do the dbsyncs) 3) Update from Stein to Train of controller 4) Update from Rocky to Train of compute nodes We are trying to do the same to update from Train to Xena, but now there is a problem because nova services on the controller node refuse to start since they find too old compute nodes (this is indeed a new feature, properly documented in the release notes). As a workaround we had to manually modify the "version" field of the compute nodes in the nova.services table. Is it ok, or is there a cleaner way to manage the issue ? Thanks, Massimo

5 10

[devstack][openstack-qa] DevStack upgrade betweem major releases
by Eduardo Santos 27 Feb '22

27 Feb '22

Hello folks, What is the procedure for upgrading a DevSack deployment from one major release to another? I didn't find any information on this in the official documentation. [1] My team maintains DevStack deployments used to provision virtual machines to developers. How can we, let's say, upgrade a stable/xena DevStack to stable/yoga, when it's released? Best regards, Eduardo Santos [1] https://docs.openstack.org/devstack/latest/

3 2

[TripleO] Gate blocker - centos-9 standalone and multinode
by Bhagyashri Shewale 27 Feb '22

27 Feb '22

Hi All, We have an issue affecting standalone and multinode centos-9 check/gate jobs due to tempest test failure. Details: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1962298 We are currently deciding on the best course of action for unblocking this issue. We will post an update once the check/gate is clear. Until then, please hold on rechecking. Thanks and Regards Bhagyashri Shewale

2 1

[Manila] Manila Collaborative Review Session - Thursday, March 10th
by Liron Kuchlani 26 Feb '22

26 Feb '22

Hi all, We are planning a Manila collaborative review session on Thursday, March 10th, to walk through the following proposed feature: - Add S-RBAC tests for manila [1] The session will start at 14:30 UTC and continue through the first half of the weekly upstream manila community meeting as needed. We will use an etherpad [2] during the session to capture notes and discussions. Hope you can all join us, [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/805938 [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Manila-S-RBAC-collaborative-review

3 3

[cinder] Yoga FEATURE FREEZE in effect
by Brian Rosmaita 26 Feb '22

26 Feb '22

Hello Argonauts, Having passed Milestone-3 this week (and yes, it was painful), let's evaluate where we are with cinder Yoga features: - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/yoga Note: You must apply for a Feature Freeze Exception (FFE) by 17:00 UTC on Tuesday 1 March. Features granted an FFE must be in the gate by 20:00 UTC on Monday 7 March. Being granted an FFE is not a guarantee that your feature will be included in Yoga. Note to reviewers: please concentrate on the below over the next week. 1. Complete transition to Alembic - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/complete-transition-to-alembic - this is essential technical debt elimination - has a Feature Freeze Exception 2. Reset State Robustification - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/reset-state-robustification - Tushar has been working patiently on this forever - not a destabilizing change - has a Feature Freeze Exception - let's prioritize getting the base patch reviewed and merged, and we can see how far we can work up the stack before 7 March. - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/773985/ Driver features 3. HPE Nimble driver rename - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/nimble-change-location - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/786054 - has one +2 - patch has passed third party CI configured with the old name *and* with the rename - has an FFE Hitachi VSP driver The below require this non-feature patch, which addresses followup issues - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/827259/ - has one +2 - doesn't need an FFE because it's a bugfix, but let's get it reviewed and merged! 4. Support AIX as host OS type for VSP Driver - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/hitachi-vsp-aix-os-type - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/828061 - has one +2 - has an FFE 5. Target Port Assignment for VSP Driver - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/hitachi-vsp-tgt-port-asgn - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/828060 - has one +2 - has an FFE Questionable: 1. The Return of Make Cinder Consistent and Secure RBAC Ready - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/s-rbac-ready-y - community goal - I will meet with the cinder Zed PTL to discuss what to do about this one (may give a FFE for just part) 2. Hitachi: Port Scheduler for VSP Driver - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/hitachi-vsp-port-scheduler - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/828696 - Code and tests look mostly fine, and CI is passing - some really minor issues and needs a release note - needs to be rebased on latest version of 828060 - not giving an auto-FFE because it hasn't had a +2 yet - must apply for an FFE 3. ibm-svf-portset - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/ibm-svf-portset - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/817351 - no +2s because third-party CI isn't passing - let's face it, no one is going to review this with failing CI even if it gets an FFE - must apply for an FFE

1 0

[Magnum] heat-container-agent not able to talk to keystone
by Satish Patel 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

Folks, I am trying to deploy k8s cluster using magnum on openstack and found cluster creation stuck during kube master heat deployment and when i look into logs i found following Feb 25 22:09:26 k8s-foo-jqpxkt2y7e46-master-0 heat-container-agent[2342]: Authorization failed: Unable to establish connection to http://192.168.75.100:5000/v3/auth/tokens Feb 25 22:09:26 k8s-foo-jqpxkt2y7e46-master-0 heat-container-agent[2342]: Source [heat] Unavailable. Feb 25 22:09:26 k8s-foo-jqpxkt2y7e46-master-0 podman[2311]: Authorization failed: Unable to establish connection to http://192.168.75.100:5000/v3/auth/tokens Feb 25 22:09:26 k8s-foo-jqpxkt2y7e46-master-0 podman[2311]: Source [heat] Unavailable. In my deployment it's a private cloud so all control plane components running on private address space and k8s cluster created their own private network which is not routable so the kube master node can't talk to keystone. I can't put my HAProxy on a public address. In that case what are the options I have? I am running OVN for networking deployed by kolla-ansible. ~S

1 0

[manila] Yoga FFE request
by Fernando Ferraz 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

Hi Team, I'd like to request a FFE for the following changes we have been working on for the Yoga cycle. They are all part of the effort to partially implement spec *Add spec for multiple subnet share servers* *[1]* in Manila.: 826928: Support multiple subnets per AZ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/826928 826462: Container: Multiple subnets per AZ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/826462 825155: NetApp ONTAP: Add support to multiple subnets per AZ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/825155 826928: Support multiple subnets per AZ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/826928 All changes were submitted in time and there has been significant progress in reviews until this point. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/619925 Regards, Fernando

2 2

[manila] RC1 bugsquash next week, no weekly IRC meetings until 17th March 2022
by Goutham Pacha Ravi 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

Hello there zorillas, It's time again to gather and squash some bugs together! We're hosting a bugsquash week between 3rd March 2022 and 10th March 2022. We've a preliminary list of bugs scoped out [1]. We'd love for you to participate by claiming a bug or two to fix during the week and reviewing bug fixes. Some of these bug fixes are in-progress, and we'll be conducting collaborative reviews to merge them during the week. If you'd like to work on something, please add it to the list [1] We'll use meetpad [2] to hang out opportunistically during the week at different times to review code or brainstorm, please watch the chatter on OFTC's #openstack-manila. However, a few scheduled events: * We'll have a kick-off at 1500 UTC on 3rd March 2022 * A "almost there" check in on 8th March 2022 at 1600 UTC on 8th March 2022 * A collab-review for S-RBAC tempest tests [3] at 1430 UTC on 10th March 2022 * A wrap up for the bugsquash week at 1530 UTC on 10th March 2022 All these will occur in the meetpad room; and these times overlap with our weekly IRC meetings - so we'll skip those. If you have any topics to discuss, please call our attention on this mailing list or on OFTC's #openstack-manila. Thanks, and hope to see you there! Goutham [1] https://ethercalc.openstack.org/t727llczm00f [2] https://meetpad.opendev.org/ManilaYogaRC1Bugsquash [3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-February/027329…

1 0

[all][tc] What's happening in Technical Committee: summary 25th Feb, 21: Reading: 5 min
by Ghanshyam Mann 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

Hello Everyone, Here is this week's summary of the Technical Committee activities. 1. TC Meetings: ============ * We had this week's meeting on 24th. Most of the meeting discussions are summarized below (Completed or in-progress activities section). Meeting full logs are available @https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-02-24-15.00.log.html * Next week's meeting is on 4th March Thursday 15:00 UTC, feel free to add the topic on the agenda[1] by 3rd March. 2. What we completed this week: ========================= * Zed cycle technical election[2] * Switch Keystone back to PTL model[3] 3. Activities In progress: ================== TC Tracker for Yoga cycle ------------------------------ * This etherpad includes the Yoga cycle targets/working items for TC[4]. 2 out of 9 items are completed. Open Reviews ----------------- * Eight open reviews for ongoing activities[5]. Zed cycle Leaderless projects ---------------------------------- As elections are closed, 17 projects are missing the nomination and out of those 11 have the late nomination. 6 projects are still seeking leaders. As the next step, TC will work on the assignment of leaders if we find any other steps on these leaderless projects[6]. Zed cycle testing runtime ------------------------------ I started the Zed cycle testing runtime, please check and give any objection if there is any[7] PTG Preparation -------------------- I have started the etherpad for TC PTG[8] preparation as well as for TC+Community Leaders sessions[9]. Also, doodle poll to select the slots[10] Testing and bumping the lower bounds in requirements.txt --------------------------------------------------------------------- Brian brought this topic while there was discussion on os-bricks bumping the minimum in requirements.rst[11]. As we do not test the lower bounds, we are not sure if existing lower bounds work or not. Telling anyone to reply on those is no guarantee that they will work or not. As TC, we agreed to give more clear direction on lower bounds and that is why we will discuss this topic in Zed PTG. Meanwhile, os-brick bumping the minimum is fine. Release identification and release name ----------------------------------------------- The proposal is under review and updates [12] Dropping tags framework ------------------------------ part1 of this is merged[13], part-2 of updating release script and other tags migration is under-progress. TC position on release cadence ------------------------------------- The proposal is under review and updates [14]. Fixing Zuul config error ---------------------------- Requesting projects with zuul config error to look into those and fix them which should not take much time[15]. Project updates ------------------- * Retire js-openstack-lib (waiting on Adjutant to have new PTL/maintainer) [16] 4. How to contact the TC: ==================== If you would like to discuss or give feedback to TC, you can reach out to us in multiple ways: 1. Email: you can send the email with tag [tc] on openstack-discuss ML[17]. 2. Weekly meeting: The Technical Committee conduct a weekly meeting every Thursday 15 UTC [18] 3. Ping us using 'tc-members' nickname on #openstack-tc IRC channel. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-February/027412… http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-February/027411… [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/829037 [4] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-yoga-tracker [5] https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:openstack/governance+status:open [6] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zed-leaderless [7] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/830454 [8] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-zed-ptg [9] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-ptl-interaction-zed [10] https://doodle.com/poll/gz4dy67vmew5wmn9 https://doodle.com/poll/dcer6i3wk2b8eim3 [11] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-February/027343… https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/828802 [12] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/829563 [13] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/822900 [14] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/828777 [15] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zuul-config-error-openstack [16] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/798540 [17] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss [18] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Technical_Committee_Meeting -gmann

1 0

[release] Release countdown for week R-4, Feb 28 - Mar 04
by Előd Illés 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

Development Focus ----------------- We just passed feature freeze! Until release branches are cut, you should stop accepting featureful changes to deliverables following the cycle-with-rc release model, or to libraries. Exceptions should be discussed on separate threads on the mailing-list, and feature freeze exceptions approved by the team's PTL. Focus should be on finding and fixing release-critical bugs, so that release candidates and final versions of the Yogadeliverables can be proposed, well ahead of the final Yogarelease date. General Information ------------------- We are still finishing up processing a few release requests, but the Yogarelease requirements are now frozen. If new library releases are needed to fix release-critical bugs in Yoga, you must request a Requirements Freeze Exception (RFE) from the requirements team before we can do a new release to avoid having something released in Yoga that is not actually usable. This is done by posting to the openstack-discuss mailing list with a subject line similar to: [$PROJECT][requirements] RFE requested for $PROJECT_LIB Include justification/reasoning for why a RFE is needed for this lib. If/when the requirements team OKs the post-freeze update, we can then process a new release. A soft String freeze is now in effect, in order to let the I18N team do the translation work in good conditions. In Horizon and the various dashboard plugins, you should stop accepting changes that modify user-visible strings. Exceptions should be discussed on the mailing-list. By March 24th, 2022this will become a hard string freeze, with no changes in user-visible strings allowed. Actions ------- stable/yogabranches should be created soon for all not-already-branched libraries. You should expect 2-3 changes to be proposed for each: a .gitreview update, a reno update (skipped for projects not using reno), and a tox.ini constraints URL update. Please review those in priority so that the branch can be functional ASAP. The Prelude section of reno release notes is rendered as the top level overview for the release. Any important overall messaging for Yoga changes should be added there to make sure the consumers of your release notes see them. Finally, if you haven't proposed Yogacycle-highlights yet, you are already late to the party. Please see our email for details: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-February/027361… Upcoming Deadlines & Dates -------------------------- RC1 deadline: March 10th, 2022(R-3 week) Final RC deadline: March 24th, 2022(R-1 week) Final Yogarelease: March 30th, 2022 Next PTG: April 4 - 8, 2022 (virtual) ElődIllés irc: elodilles

1 0

[all][elections][tc] Technical Committee Election Results
by Ghanshyam Mann 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

For 5 TC open seats, there were 5 candidates so no election was required. Please join me in congratulating the 5 newly elected members of the Technical Committee (TC). Amy Marrich (spotz) Arne Wiebalck (arnewiebalck) Kristi Nikolla (knikolla) Brian Rosmaita (rosmaita) Sławek Kapłoński (slaweq) Full results: no election required. Election process details and results are also available here: https://governance.openstack.org/election/ Thank you to all of the candidates, having a good group of candidates helps engage the community in our democratic process. Thank you for another great round. -gmann, on behalf of the OpenStack Technical Election Officials

3 2

[all][elections][ptl] Project Team Lead Zed Election Conclusion and Results
by Ghanshyam Mann 24 Feb '22

24 Feb '22

Thank you to the all candidates who put their names forward for Project Team Lead (PTL) in this election. A healthy, open process breeds trust in our decision making capability. Thank you to all those who make this process possible. Now for the results of the PTL election process, please join me in extending congratulations to the following PTLs: * Barbican : Douglas Mendizábal * Blazar : Pierre Riteau * Cinder : Rajat Dhasmana * Cloudkitty : Rafael Weingartner * Cyborg : Bailin Zhang * Designate : Michael Johnson * Ec2 Api : Andrey Pavlov * Glance : Abhishek Kekane * Horizon : Vishal Manchanda * Ironic : Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira * Keystone : Douglas Mendizábal * Kolla : Michal Nasiadka * Kuryr : Maysa de Macedo Souza * Manila : Carlos Silva * Neutron : Lajos Katona * Nova : Sylvain Bauza * Octavia : Gregory Thiemonge * OpenStack Helm : Gage Hugo * OpenStackAnsible : Dmitriy Rabotyagov * OpenStackSDK : Artem Goncharov * Puppet OpenStack : Takashi Kajinami * Quality Assurance : Martin Kopec * Rally : Andrey Kurilin * Release Management : Elod Illes * Requirements : Matthew Thode * Sahara : Fossen Qiu * Storlets : Takashi Kajinami * Swift : Tim Burke * Tacker : Yasufumi Ogawa * Telemetry : Matthias Runge * Tripleo : James Slagle * Vitrage : Eyal Bar-Ilan * Winstackers : Lucian Petrut For remaining projects (without PTL candaidates), TC will work on the appointment. Elections: no election required. Election process details and results are also available here: https://governance.openstack.org/election/ Thank you to all involved in the PTL election process -gmann, on behalf of the OpenStack Technical Election Officials

1 0

[neutron] Drivers meeting agenda - 25.02.2022.
by Lajos Katona 24 Feb '22

24 Feb '22

Hi Neutron Drivers, The agenda for tomorrow's drivers meeting is at [1]. * [RFE][L3][OVS] use controller (ovs-agent) send (packet-out) RA to (VMs) ports (https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1961011 ) * [RFE][OVN] Support DNS subdomains at a network level ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1960850 ) * Gratuitous ARPs are not sent during master transition: ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1952907) ** For this one there are a few wip patches: ** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/821434 ** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/821433 ** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/712474 [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers#Agenda See you at the meeting tomorrow. Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)

1 0

No IP address in VMs instances ( neutron dhcp ) on fresh kolla-ansible deployment
by A Monster 24 Feb '22

24 Feb '22

I've deployed an all in one Openstack on Centos 8 stream using kolla-ansible following the tutorial in openstack kolla website. After the deployment, I used the int-runonce script to create networks and stuff, but after launching a cirros VM, I found that the network interfaces inside the VM didn't get IP addresses from the neutron DHCP agent, therefore that instance was not reachable from nowhere. The docker container of the dhcp agent is up and running, but VMs don't receive any data from it.

2 1

[all][tc] Technical Committee next weekly meeting on Feb 24th at 1500 UTC
by Ghanshyam Mann 23 Feb '22

23 Feb '22

Hello Everyone, Technical Committee's next weekly meeting is scheduled for Feb 24th at 1500 UTC. If you would like to add topics for discussion, please add them to the below wiki page by Wednesday, Feb 23rd, at 2100 UTC. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting -gmann

1 1

[Oslo] Core team cleanup
by Herve Beraud 23 Feb '22

23 Feb '22

Hello, I took a look at our core team, "oslo-core" in gerrit. We have a few individuals who I feel have moved on from Oslo in their focus. I looked at the reviews from stackalytics.io for the last 180 days[2]. These individuals have no activity during the last 180 days: - Zane Bitter; - Doug Hellmann; - Sean McGinnis. These individuals have publicly expressed that they are moving on from Oslo: - Ken Guisti; - Moisés Guimarães De Medeiros. I'd like to propose we remove these folks from our core team, while thanking them for their contributions. I'll also note that I'd still value +1/-1 from these folks with a lot of significance, and encourage them to review their areas of expertise! If anyone on the list plans to start reviewing in Oslo again, then I also think we can postpone the removal for the time being and re-evaluate later. Please let me know if that's the case. Please reply and let me know any agreements or concerns with this change. Thank you! [1] https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/106,members [2] https://www.stackalytics.io/report/contribution?module=oslo-group&project_t… <https://www.stackalytics.io/report/contribution?module=tripleo-group&projec…> -- Hervé Beraud Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat irc: hberaud https://github.com/4383/ https://twitter.com/4383hberaud

1 0

[all][elections][ptl][tc] Combined PTL/TC Zed cycle Election Nominations Last Days
by Ghanshyam Mann 23 Feb '22

23 Feb '22

Hello Everyone, A quick reminder that we are in the last hours for declaring PTL and TC candidacies. Nominations are open until Feb 15, 2022 23:45 UTC. If you want to stand for election, don't delay, follow the instructions at [1] to make sure the community knows your intentions. Make sure your nomination has been submitted to the openstack/election repository and approved by election officials. Election statistics[2]: Nominations started @ 2022-02-08 23:45:00 UTC Nominations end @ 2022-02-15 23:45:00 UTC Nominations duration : 7 days, 0:00:00 Nominations remaining : 23:30:36 Nominations progress : 86.01% --------------------------------------------------- Projects[1] : 49 Projects with candidates : 19 ( 38.78%) Projects with election : 0 ( 0.00%) --------------------------------------------------- Need election : 0 () Need appointment : 30 (Adjutant Cloudkitty Freezer Heat Ironic Kuryr Magnum Masakari Monasca Murano OpenStackAnsible OpenStack_Charms Openstack_Chef Rally Release_Management Requirements Sahara Senlin Skyline Solum Swift Tacker Telemetry Tripleo Trove Venus Vitrage Watcher Zaqar Zun) =================================================== Stats gathered @ 2022-02-15 00:14:24 UTC This means that with approximately 1 days left, 30 projects will be deemed leaderless. In this case the TC will oversee PTL selection as described by [3]. There are also currently 3 confirmed candidates for the 5 open Technical Committee. Thank you, [1] https://governance.openstack.org/election/#how-to-submit-a-candidacy [2] Any open reviews at https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:open+project:openstack/election have not been factored into these stats. [3] https://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for… -gmann & The OpenStack Technical Election Officials

4 7

[TripleO] Offline Installation Support
by Anirudh Gupta 23 Feb '22

23 Feb '22

Hi Team, We have successfully done POC on deploying my TripleO Train HA Setup with Baremetal Provisioning on Overcloud Node as well. We would like to thank Tripleo community members for helping us and resolving all our concerns at all times. Moving forward, we need to deploy the setup on the Lab environment for which I need some support as well. We don't have internet in Lab machines, all that we have is access to a central server (staging) which has internet access and we can download all the requirements over there. Queries: - Is there any feasible method to install Undercloud and Overcloud Machines in complete offline mode? - If yes, then 1. What are the steps to download all related stuff on the staging server? 2. What modifications would be required in undercloud/overcloud and other configuration files to support this? Regards Anirudh Gupta Regards Anirudh Gupta

3 2

[Diversity] Diversity and Inclusion Meeting -change - short notice
by Amy Marrich 23 Feb '22

23 Feb '22

Due to a conflict from another member and my decision to take PTO to play with the dogs, we are moving the March meeting to this Friday, February 25th at 16:00 UTC. The meeting will be held on video at https://meetpad.opendev.org/osf- diversity-and-inclusion as recently voted on and the agenda can be found at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda. Please join us! Thanks, Amy (spotz)

1 0

SUBJECT: [ ironic][QA] Cycle With Intermediary Unreleased Deliverables
by Armstrong Foundjem 23 Feb '22

23 Feb '22

Quick reminder that we'll need a release very soon for a number of deliverables following a cycle-with-intermediary release model but which have not done *any* release yet in the Yoga cycle: ironic-prometheus-exporter ironic-python-agent-builder ironic-ui networking-baremetal networking-generic-switch patrole Those should be released ASAP, and in all cases before the March 10th deadline, so that we have a release to include in the final Yoga release. Best regards, Armstrong Foundjem irc: @armstrong

2 1

[cinder] Bug deputy report for week of 02-23-2022
by Sofia Enriquez 23 Feb '22

23 Feb '22

This is a bug report from 02-03-2022 to 02-23-2022. Agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting The bug report is back! Today's meeting is on video. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Medium - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1960206 "[RBD] Amend the formula of retrieving total_capacity for a rbd pool." Fix proposed to master. Assigned to Gorka. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-brick/+bug/1961102 "NVMe-oF doesn't disconnect." Unassigned. Problem with request ID: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1960329 "Wrong request ID on API middleware filters." Fix proposed to master. Assigned to Gorka. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1960021 "Request to list REST API versions doesn't return the request id." Fix proposed to master. Assigned to Gorka. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1960020 "Duplicated request ids in the logs." Fix proposed to master. Assigned to Gorka. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1960019 "REST API responses have wrong request ID when using noauth." Fix proposed to master. Assigned to Gorka. Low - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1960315 "[IBM Storwize] Delete volume issue in reverse replication." Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1960314 "[IBM Storwize] Resize issue in reverse replication." Unassigned. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1961548 "[Storwize] Fix multiple SVC CLI calls to create volume operation." Fix proposed to master. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1959178 "SolidFire: Error message logged when creating volume from image." Fix proposed to master. Have a +2! Wishlist - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1960574 "Provide back-end Qos support for spdk driver." Unassigned. Incomplete - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1959350 " [RBD] Volume status becomes available after force delete." Unassigned. Invalid - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1961685 "cinder-volume.service crashes: no module named 'wrapt'." If I'm missing bugs please let me know! Cheers! -- Sofía Enriquez she/her Software Engineer Red Hat PnT <https://www.redhat.com> IRC: @enriquetaso @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc> <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0

[infra] Gerrit email outage?
by Stephen Finucane 23 Feb '22

23 Feb '22

I haven't received any emails from Gerrit since midday (UTC) yesterday. Chatting on IRC, it seems I'm not alone. Has something changed in Gerrit or is this a simple outage? Cheers, Stephen

2 2