Open Stack

On 09/17/2014 05:38 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> I talked with Gary and he is planning on avoiding voting -1 automatically,
> so I'm happy with the account being re-enabled.
> Allowing 'recheck' isn't as big of a concern if it's not blocking patches.

Hi Kevin,

Thanks for helping Gary, this has been the whole plan behind the third
party structure, operators helping operators, so I really appreciate you
stepping up and supporting his work. Thank you, Kevin.

Well supporting recheck is part of the requirements for every ci:
http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requirements So if this account
doesn't support this, I still don't understand how they ever had voting
permissions.

Let's get recheck syntax supported please.

Thanks,
Anita.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info> wrote:
> 
>> On 09/17/2014 12:54 PM, Gary Duan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have looked into all the votes our CI system posted. It votes -1 for
>>> about one tenth of patches. Among these -1 votes, about 3/10 were correct
>>> vote, and the rest were caused by same two test cases related to ipv6. I
>>> have skipped these two cases.
>>>
>>> One thing I want to say is, among all CI systems, we probably run the
>> most
>>> test cases, more than 200 tempest tests.
>> I do encourage you to post verifiable data when you make assertions of
>> this nature.
>>
>>
>>> It runs and votes reliably for the
>>> past week, except those two IPv6 test cases.
>> Again, data would be great to see.
>>
>>>
>>> I am working with Kevin in the past a few days. I want to change the
>>> comment message format, so our result can show up on the right hand side
>> of
>>> the page. We will not to vote -1 but only give an indication of failure.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gary
>> That's wonderful Gary, good work.
>>
>> When Kevin lets me know that his concerns outlined in this email:
>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/third-party-announce/2014-September/000023.html
>> have been addressed you can be re-enabled and non-voting. Once you
>> follow the process outlined in the prior email to get Neutron to vouch
>> for your ability to vote responsibly, you may have voting permissions.
>>
>> Having a presence on irc would also be very helpful.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Anita.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> vArmour CI is having difficulty and has been disabled several times
>>>> recently. It is currently disabled.
>>>>
>>>> Once it is re-enabled it will have comment only permissions on most
>>>> repos and can vote on the sandbox repo.
>>>>
>>>> Please stabilize your ci and follow these instructions to get voting
>>>> permissions on your system:
>>>>
>>>>
>> http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#permissions-on-your-third-party-system
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Anita.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Third-party-announce mailing list
>>>> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
>>>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Third-party-announce mailing list
>>> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Third-party-announce mailing list
>> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Third-party-announce mailing list
> Third-party-announce at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/third-party-announce
>