Open Stack

John,

I believe that backlog should be different much simpler then specs.

Imho Operators don't have time / don't want to write long long specs and
analyze how they are aligned with specs
or moreover how they should be implemented and how they impact
performance/security/scalability. They want
just to provide feedback and someday get it implemented/fixed.

In Rally we chose different way called "feature request".
The process is the same as for specs, but template is much simpler.

Here is the page:
 https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_requests.html

And here is the sample of feature request:
https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_request/launch_specific_benchmark.html



Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Boris Pavlovic <bpavlovic at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> John,
>
> I believe that backlog should be different much simpler then specs.
>
> Imho Operators don't have time / don't want to write long long specs and
> analyze how they are aligned with specs
> or moreover how they should be implemented and how they impact
> performance/security/scalability. They want
> just to provide feedback and someday get it implemented/fixed.
>
> In Rally we chose different way called "feature request".
> The process is the same as for specs, but template is much simpler.
>
> Here is the page:
>  https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_requests.html
>
> And here is the sample of feature request:
>
> https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/feature_request/launch_specific_benchmark.html
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Boris Pavlovic
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:47 PM, John Garbutt <john at johngarbutt.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was talking with Matt (VW) about how best some large deployment
>> working sessions could send their requirements to Nova.
>>
>> As an operator, if you have a problem that needs fixing or use case
>> that needs addressing, a great way of raising that issue with the
>> developer community is a "Backlog" nova-spec.
>>
>> You can read more about Nova's backlog specs here:
>> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/backlog/
>>
>> Any questions, comments or ideas, please do let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John
>>
>> PS
>> In Kilo we formally started accepting "backlog specs", although we are
>> only just getting the first of these submitted now. There is actually
>> a patch to fix up how they get rendered:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182793/2
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150514/d7eeb4d1/attachment.html>