[tc][all] Follow up pain point discussion

Thomas Goirand zigo at debian.org
Thu Dec 9 10:00:05 UTC 2021


I missed this thread and the discussion, though I've added to the etherpad:


    FIX NEEDED - Glance doesn't work well over uwsgi, it's the only
service with this state (appart from Swfit). We would need Glance to
fully gate using uwsgi in the CI.

    FIX NEEDED - Glance upload on Ceph is painfully slow. So much that
many operators simply don't use the Ceph backend.


    FIX NEEDED - Swift continues to use Eventlet. Switching to uwsgi
increases performances dramatically. Switching to uwsgi is possible for
swift-proxy, swift-container and swift-account, but it completely fails
for swift-object. Swift needs to fully switch to uwsgi in the CI, and
repair the swift-proxy to swift-object protocol to follow *real* http
specifictions (at some point, swift-object drifted away from respecting
http protocol, which makes it impossible to run it under uwsgi).

I hope this helps,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

On 12/9/21 5:42 AM, Rico Lin wrote:
> Dear all
> First, thank all who join us in the discussion or help on the etherpad [1]
> Here are wrap-ups of our first meeting yesterday:
> In the meeting, we have quick work through pain points for a couple of
> projects: Cinder, Ironic, Neutron, QA, Horizon.
> And put some action or tags(like `FIX NEEDED` or `INFO NEEDED`).
> As for Nova, there is already have a good quality of replies and
> actions, gmann will help with discussing tags with rest of Nova team.
> Horizon team will go through the rest item in team meeting and finish
> tagging after.
> Also, TC picks the log level topic (check out log level discussion in
> [2]) as one of the topics in next TC meeting.
> So if you're interested, please check out [1] and kindly provide
> your feedback.
> We plan to go through with other projects in our next pain point
> meeting, which we expect to schedule around mid. of January.
> Meanwhile, if teams can help with providing replies and tags will be
> very helpful.
> As for possible cross-project pain points:
> The OSC discussion went very well. The discussion includes OpenStack
> Client and OpenStackSDK.
> OSC seems to get more works done than the last time it was proposed as a
> community goal (back in Train cycle?),
> so TC has set up a topic in the next TC meeting to discuss the
> possibility to set this as a community goal (for z or after-z cycles).
> RabbitMQ was discussed briefly but didn't have any specific suggestions
> or actions. So if you have any, please kindly provide your feedback in
> this ML or [3].
> If you would like to suggest other cross-project pain points, kindly
> suggest in ML or [1] and help TCs to identify them.
> Finally, we collect pain points and hope to get things fixed/improved,
> so if you're interested to help with targeting any of the items in [1],
> you're most welcome to reach out to project teams or at least provide
> your feedback in [1]. 
> [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination
> <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination>
> [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination#L261
> <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination#L261>
> [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination#L21
> <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination#L21>
> *Rico Lin*
> OIF Individual Board of directors, OpenStack TC, Multi-arch SIG chair,
> Heat PTL, 
> Senior Software Engineer at EasyStack
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 4:39 PM Rico Lin <ricolin at ricolky.com
> <mailto:ricolin at ricolky.com>> wrote:
>     Dear all
>     For pain point discussion,
>     Let's schedule the video meeting for *Dec. 8th, 15:00 UTC time*
>     Location: https://meet.google.com/xsx-inbw-mos
>     <https://meet.google.com/xsx-inbw-mos>
>     *Rico Lin*
>     OIF Individual Board of directors, OpenStack TC, Multi-arch SIG
>     chair, Heat PTL, 
>     Senior Software Engineer at EasyStack
>     On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 5:37 PM Rico Lin <ricolin at ricolky.com
>     <mailto:ricolin at ricolky.com>> wrote:
>         Dear all
>         The pain point collection etherpad [1] seems to get good
>         attention from teams.
>         We plan to host a one-hour video meeting to keep the discussion
>         going.
>         Please fill in the doodle to select your preferred time if you
>         can join us:
>         https://doodle.com/poll/kur2mfywceerqcvh?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link
>         <https://doodle.com/poll/kur2mfywceerqcvh?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link>
>         The discussion will be hosted in video format.
>         Here are some items (but not limited to) I expect we will
>         discuss and hopefully put some actions/efforts on.
>           * General Pain point: RabbitMQ
>           * General Pain point: OpenStackClient support
>           * General project pain point discussion: How to encourage
>             teams to work/reply on pain points.
>         Meanwhile, we encourage all to check the etherpad and provide
>         your feedback.
>         Also if teams can help to answer questions/concerns on etherpad
>         (like Nova team does) will be greatly appreciated.
>         [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination
>         <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination>
>         *Rico Lin*

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list