[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need to have a mid-cycle?

Ruby Loo rlooyahoo at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 17:16:34 UTC 2015


On 10 November 2015 at 12:08, Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 11/10/2015 05:45 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the last Ironic meeting [1] we started a discussion about whether
>> we need to have a mid-cycle meeting for the Mitaka cycle or not. Some
>> ideas about the format of the midcycle were presented in that
>> conversation and this email is just a follow up on that conversation.
>>
>> The ideas presented were:
>>
>> 1. Normal mid-cycle
>>
>> Same format as the previous ones, the meetup will happen in a specific
>> venue somewhere in the world.
>>
>
> I would really want to see you all as often as possible. However, I don't
> see much value in proper face-to-face mid-cycles as compared to improving
> our day-to-day online communications.


+2.

My take on mid-cycles is that if folks want to have one, that is fine, I
might not attend :)

My preference is 4) no mid-cycle -- and try to work more effectively with
people in different locations and time zones.

--ruby
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151111/ab753581/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list