[openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

Joe Gordon joe.gordon0 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 3 16:57:24 UTC 2013

On Dec 3, 2013 6:45 PM, "Jarret Raim" <jarret.raim at rackspace.com> wrote:
> >With the introduction of programs (think: official teams), all
> >incubated/integrated projects must belong to an official program... So
> >when a project applies for incubation but is not part of an official
> >program yet, it de-facto also applies to be considered a program.
> Ahh, understood. So I guess we'd be asking for a new program then.

While I am all for adding a new program, I think we should only add one if
we rule out all existing programs as a home.

With that in mind why not add this to the  keystone program? Perhaps that
may require a tweak to keystones mission statement, but that is doable. I
saw a partial answer to this somewhere but not a full one.

> >I'm not 100% sure we'll keep that "election" requirement. I think the
> >program application should have an initial PTL named on it. The way
> >that's determined is up to the team (natural candidate, election...).
> It sounds like if we have a PTL election as part of the normal Icehouse
> schedule, we should be covered here?
> >No, since the team produces code the ATC designation method is pretty
> >well established. This rule cares for programs which have weirder
> >deliverables.
> Easy enough, thanks for the clarification.
> Jarret
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131203/7a536d95/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list