Open Stack

I think both of your statements are wrong.

python-swiftclient (on of the swift project deliverables) uses oslo.

Our main issue with oslo is the current state of packaging it. Solve the current copy/paste code tree dance (something that is being worked on, I believe), and we'll be much more open to using oslo.

--John



On Apr 24, 2013, at 7:25 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 04/24/2013 09:20 AM, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
>>> ...there's a huge community around WebOb and they have all
>>> implicitly agreed to contribute back solutions to issues
>>> that come up.
>> 
>> Why did Swift move away from WebOb? Are they planning to go
>> Back to using it at some point?
> 
> Swift doesn't use anything in Oslo, so I don't include it in these
> conversations because the Swift developers have shown little interest in
> using anything that the other OpenStack projects are using.
> 
> The focus of these discussions -- at least as far as I thought the focus
> was -- is to bring alignment within non-Swift OpenStack projects to the
> usage of a duplicative set of WSGI-related libs, as I'm pretty sure the
> Swift developer community doesn't care much about that goal.
> 
> John D, feel free to correct me if that last statement is wrong.
> 
> Best,
> -jay
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev