Open Stack

I doubt anyone would argue against more data analysis :) 

I’d like to ask the independent analyst (who helped produce the report) to dig into production stage deployments with low NPS scores and see if there are any other correlations.

Jon and I also threw out a few ideas on the list - release version, cloud size, projects used - are there any other factors you are specifically interested in analyzing?

Cheers,
Lauren


> On Nov 17, 2015, at 2:50 PM, Roland Chan <roland at aptira.com> wrote:
> 
> That's exactly the sort of analysis required.
> 
> Distribution of the data is only needed if the people who currently have access to it are unable to perform the analysis for some reason.
> 
> First though, the committee must resolve that the analysis is needed. Once that is done we can investigate what needs to happen.
> 
> Do we have agreement on whether further analysis is warranted?
> 
> Roland
> 
> 
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 02:28 Jonathan Proulx <jon at csail.mit.edu <mailto:jon at csail.mit.edu>> wrote:
> 
> Perhaps it would be valuable to take a couple more cuts of the
> deployment data (size, release, projects used etc) by promoters and
> detractors?
> 
> That might be informative without requiring further distribution of
> raw data.  Are there any other specific comparisions people think
> might be useful?
> 
> Remembering that this is a vouluntary survey mostly announced through
> chennels frequented by people involved in the community to some extent
> I'd expect to see a relatively strong positive bias in results, so if
> anyone has actionable ideas on how to get deeeper I'm for it, but I'm
> also not sure I put too much importance on that metric by itself for
> reasons others have mentioned.
> 
> -Jon
> 
> --
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20151118/e7008a1c/attachment.html>