Open Stack

This matches what we discussed at the summit.

Tim/Subbu/Jon, can you give an official nod?


Suggestion for your wording change - use "Working Group" rather than
"project" to keep in-line with what we've been using so far.



Regards,


Tom

On 07/07/15 10:26, Rochelle Grober wrote:
> Hey, folks.
> 
>  
> 
> The Product Working Group is in the process of trying to get a
> repository instantiated for User Stories (hopefully at
> openstack/openstack-user-stories) and in the process of walking through
> the process, found it would be much simpler to actually form a project
> that owns the repository.  Once that was realized, it was suggested
> (thanks Thierry!) that the likely best location for us would be under
> the auspices of the User Committee.
> 
>  
> 
> With the committee’s ok, I’d like to modify the current patch commit
> message, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197754/ to read:
> 
>  
> 
> “The Product Working group would like to be formally recognized as a
> project within the User Committee governance body.”
> 
>  
> 
> And would change the file to be modified to be the
> openstack/governance/reference/user-committee-repos.yaml with the
> group’s information.
> 
>  
> 
> What do you guys think?  The patch is under discussion at tomorrow’s
> meeting, but if I get a generally positive response from the list, I
> will be able to at least propose that the current patch be abandoned for
> one that puts the Product WG under the auspices of the User Committee.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rocky Grober (on behalf of the Product Working Group)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>