[User-committee] Approval/support for Product WG to be a project under User Committee
Tim Bell
Tim.Bell at cern.ch
Tue Jul 7 07:17:04 UTC 2015
I would be in favour of the approach as outlined (with Tom's comment included)
Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Fifield [mailto:tom at openstack.org]
> Sent: 07 July 2015 06:49
> To: user-committee at lists.openstack.org; Tim Bell; Allamaraju, Subbu; Jon
> Proulux
> Subject: Re: [User-committee] Approval/support for Product WG to be a
> project under User Committee
>
> This matches what we discussed at the summit.
>
> Tim/Subbu/Jon, can you give an official nod?
>
>
> Suggestion for your wording change - use "Working Group" rather than
> "project" to keep in-line with what we've been using so far.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tom
>
> On 07/07/15 10:26, Rochelle Grober wrote:
> > Hey, folks.
> >
> >
> >
> > The Product Working Group is in the process of trying to get a
> > repository instantiated for User Stories (hopefully at
> > openstack/openstack-user-stories) and in the process of walking
> > through the process, found it would be much simpler to actually form a
> > project that owns the repository. Once that was realized, it was
> > suggested (thanks Thierry!) that the likely best location for us would
> > be under the auspices of the User Committee.
> >
> >
> >
> > With the committee’s ok, I’d like to modify the current patch commit
> > message, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197754/ to read:
> >
> >
> >
> > “The Product Working group would like to be formally recognized as a
> > project within the User Committee governance body.”
> >
> >
> >
> > And would change the file to be modified to be the
> > openstack/governance/reference/user-committee-repos.yaml with the
> > group’s information.
> >
> >
> >
> > What do you guys think? The patch is under discussion at tomorrow’s
> > meeting, but if I get a generally positive response from the list, I
> > will be able to at least propose that the current patch be abandoned
> > for one that puts the Product WG under the auspices of the User
> Committee.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rocky Grober (on behalf of the Product Working Group)
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > User-committee mailing list
> > User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
> >
More information about the User-committee
mailing list