Open Stack

Thanks Sean and Shamail. We'll make this change effective in our 12/7 meeting.
I'll update our wiki to reflect this.
Carol

-----Original Message-----
From: sean roberts [mailto:seanroberts66 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 3:34 PM
To: Shamail
Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Product] [product] outstanding action

Thanks for the vote count Shamail. I'll get the meetbot voting to work someday.

It looks like we are at 8-4 for going with IRC meetings.

On Tuesday, December 1, 2015, Shamail <itzshamail at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I vote yes on using IRC for our weekly meeting but agree that using 
> other means (i.e. conference calls, web-based meetings, etc.) is okay 
> for sub-team meetings and for discussing specific topics.
>
> Our roadmap sub-team used google hangout exclusively during the last 
> refresh and that worked pretty well.  I like the suggestion that 
> Duncan made about posting the discussions on a YouTube channel...  I 
> will go ahead and create a YouTube channel for the ProductWG to post 
> our meetings too (e.g. upcoming mid-cycle, roadmap refresh) for anyone that is interested.
> I'll share more details on this soon with the team.  We can switch 
> from Google Hangouts to On-Air Hangouts and the video will get posted 
> automatically in that scenario.
>
> Lastly, we had tried to conduct a vote on the IRC vs. IRC+Phone topic 
> at our 11/23 team meeting[1]. The actual vote didn't register but I 
> have included how people voted below (just in case we don't hear from 
> others via
> ML):
>
> Yes = IRC only for weekly meeting and IRC/Call/Web/* for sub-team 
> meetings No = IRC + Conference call for weekly meeting and 
> IRC/Call/Web/* for sub-team meetings
>
> <kencjohnston> #vote yes
>
> <KrishR> #vote yes
>
> <sgordon> #vote yes
>
> <hughhalf> #vote yes
>
> <pchadwick> #vote no
>
> <leong> #vote no
>
> <dpk_> #vote no
>
> <Arkady_Kanevsky> #vote no
>
> <MeganR> #vote no
>
>
> Three of these people have already voted on the ML (Kenny, Hugh, and Steve), there are 6 additional votes in this meeting log: 1 yes and 5 no.
>
>
> The total count so far:
>
> *7 yes*
>
> Carol, Hugh, Kenny, Krish, Sean, Shamail, Steve
>
> *5 no*
>
> Arkady, DP, Leong, Megan, Pete
>
>
> *(Please let us know if I miscounted anyone's vote)*
>
>
> [1] 
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2015/pro
> duct_working_group.2015-11-23-21.01.log.html
>
> Thanks,
> Shamail
>
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:00 AM, sean roberts <seanroberts66 at gmail.com 
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','seanroberts66 at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> I need your feedback. We need to decide how to proceed with meetings 
> into 2016. I put forward that having conference calls are for only one 
> off, topic specific discussions. For the weekly meetings we should use 
> the regular IRC published schedule and channels just like other 
> OpenStack groups.
>
>
>
> --
> ~sean
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Product-wg at lists.openstack.org');>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>
>

--
~sean
_______________________________________________
Product-wg mailing list
Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg