[Product] Second Session at Vancouver [Discussion Today]
Shamail
itzshamail at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 22:59:46 UTC 2015
Hi everyone,
I have a perpetual conflict so I will be approximately 10-15 minutes late every time. :-(
I prefer option 3 or option 2. If we want to raise further awareness, I think option 2 achieves that goal. If we want to show progress, option 3 fits that objective.
I can't link right now but session 1 is on Monday and session 2 is on Tuesday.
Thanks,
Shamail
> On Apr 29, 2015, at 6:51 PM, <Arkady_Kanevsky at DELL.com> <Arkady_Kanevsky at DELL.com> wrote:
>
> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
>
> +1 for option #3.
> Will be late for the meeting today
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barrett, Carol L [mailto:carol.l.barrett at intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 5:39 PM
> To: sean roberts; Shamail Tahir
> Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Product] Second Session at Vancouver [Discussion Today]
>
> Sure - can kick it off.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sean roberts [mailto:seanroberts66 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 3:23 PM
> To: Shamail Tahir
> Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Product] Second Session at Vancouver [Discussion Today]
>
> Excellent breakdown. I like option 3.
>
> I will be a bit late, carol can you get the meeting started?
>
> On Wednesday, April 29, 2015, Shamail Tahir wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > We have been actively working on the content for the first session
> > [Glimpse At The Roadmap] but we have not had any discussions about the
> > second session yet [State of Product Management]. The original idea
> > when these sessions were submitted was to cover our groups charter and
> > overall progress in one session and leverage the other session to
> > share what we have learned so far [share PTL feedback]. The way we
> > have been building the first session [Glimpse At The Roadmap]
> > partially covers both of these topics. I have added an agenda item
> > for us to discuss how we should leverage the second session since we
> > are lucky enough to have two sessions at the summit.
> >
> > Here are some options that I put together, please feel free to suggest
> > others:
> >
> > *Option 1)* Stick with the original plan and divide the content being
> > created for the first session into two separate presentations (one for
> > discussing the group itself and the other for discussing the feedback
> > from PTLs and next steps) Additional comment: The group currently is
> > planning to include PTL feedback but skim over details since the
> > slides will be made available after the summit and people could read
> > the detailed items themselves at a later point. Secondly, we didn't
> > want to summarize/paraphrase PTL content too much since it could seem
> > like we are putting words into their mouth.
> >
> > *Option 2)* Keep the first session as its being built and use this
> > second session to get community advocates to give their views on the
> > state of Product Management (PTLs, maybe Tim Bell on behalf of the
> > user committee, Carol on behalf of enterprise, someone on behalf of
> > operators, etc.). The second session essentially becomes a panel with
> > discussion on how the Product WH charter could help solve community challenges.
> >
> > *Option 3)* Use the second session to build a relationship between our
> > initiative and the cross-project team to show how both solve for
> > different levels or types of a common issue (e.g. both might deliver
> > cross project items but one is tracking cross-project issues and
> > optimization while the other is identifying user stories/epic that,
> > potentially; require cross-project collaboration). This session
> > effectively becomes the how will work with cross-project to be
> > successful with our charter and help them be successful with theirs too.
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Shamail Tahir
> > Cloud Architect, EMC
> > t: @ShamailXD
> > tz: Eastern Time
> > _______________________________________________
> > Product-wg mailing list
> > Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
> >
>
>
> --
> ~sean
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
More information about the Product-wg
mailing list