Open Stack

I found it – it’s 11:15 on Tuesday.

From: Shamail [mailto:itzshamail at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 4:00 PM
To: <Arkady_Kanevsky at DELL.com>
Cc: Barrett, Carol L; <seanroberts66 at gmail.com>; <product-wg at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Product] Second Session at Vancouver [Discussion Today]

Hi everyone,

I have a perpetual conflict so I will be approximately 10-15 minutes late every time.  :-(

I prefer option 3 or option 2.  If we want to raise further awareness, I think option 2 achieves that goal.  If we want to show progress, option 3 fits that objective.

I can't link right now but session 1 is on Monday and session 2 is on Tuesday.

Thanks,
Shamail


On Apr 29, 2015, at 6:51 PM, <Arkady_Kanevsky at DELL.com<mailto:Arkady_Kanevsky at DELL.com>> <Arkady_Kanevsky at DELL.com<mailto:Arkady_Kanevsky at DELL.com>> wrote:

Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
+1 for option #3.
Will be late for the meeting today

-----Original Message-----
From: Barrett, Carol L [mailto:carol.l.barrett at intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 5:39 PM
To: sean roberts; Shamail Tahir
Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org<mailto:product-wg at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Product] Second Session at Vancouver [Discussion Today]

Sure - can kick it off.

-----Original Message-----
From: sean roberts [mailto:seanroberts66 at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 3:23 PM
To: Shamail Tahir
Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org<mailto:product-wg at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Product] Second Session at Vancouver [Discussion Today]

Excellent breakdown. I like option 3.

I will be a bit late, carol can you get the meeting started?

On Wednesday, April 29, 2015, Shamail Tahir wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> We have been actively working on the content for the first session
> [Glimpse At The Roadmap] but we have not had any discussions about the
> second session yet [State of Product Management]. The original idea
> when these sessions were submitted was to cover our groups charter and
> overall progress in one session and leverage the other session to
> share what we have learned so far [share PTL feedback]. The way we
> have been building the first session [Glimpse At The Roadmap]
> partially covers both of these topics. I have added an agenda item
> for us to discuss how we should leverage the second session since we
> are lucky enough to have two sessions at the summit.
>
> Here are some options that I put together, please feel free to suggest
> others:
>
> *Option 1)* Stick with the original plan and divide the content being
> created for the first session into two separate presentations (one for
> discussing the group itself and the other for discussing the feedback
> from PTLs and next steps) Additional comment: The group currently is
> planning to include PTL feedback but skim over details since the
> slides will be made available after the summit and people could read
> the detailed items themselves at a later point. Secondly, we didn't
> want to summarize/paraphrase PTL content too much since it could seem
> like we are putting words into their mouth.
>
> *Option 2)* Keep the first session as its being built and use this
> second session to get community advocates to give their views on the
> state of Product Management (PTLs, maybe Tim Bell on behalf of the
> user committee, Carol on behalf of enterprise, someone on behalf of
> operators, etc.). The second session essentially becomes a panel with
> discussion on how the Product WH charter could help solve community challenges.
>
> *Option 3)* Use the second session to build a relationship between our
> initiative and the cross-project team to show how both solve for
> different levels or types of a common issue (e.g. both might deliver
> cross project items but one is tracking cross-project issues and
> optimization while the other is identifying user stories/epic that,
> potentially; require cross-project collaboration). This session
> effectively becomes the how will work with cross-project to be
> successful with our charter and help them be successful with theirs too.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Shamail Tahir
> Cloud Architect, EMC
> t: @ShamailXD
> tz: Eastern Time
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Product-wg at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>


--
~sean
_______________________________________________
Product-wg mailing list
Product-wg at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Product-wg at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg

_______________________________________________
Product-wg mailing list
Product-wg at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Product-wg at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg