Open Stack

Excellent breakdown. I like option 3.

I will be a bit late, carol can you get the meeting started?

On Wednesday, April 29, 2015, Shamail Tahir <itzshamail at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> We have been actively working on the content for the first session [Glimpse
> At The Roadmap] but we have not had any discussions about the second
> session yet [State of Product Management].  The original idea when these
> sessions were submitted was to cover our groups charter and overall
> progress in one session and leverage the other session to share what we
> have learned so far [share PTL feedback].  The way we have been building
> the first session [Glimpse At The Roadmap] partially covers both of these
> topics.  I have added an agenda item for us to discuss how we should
> leverage the second session since we are lucky enough to have two sessions
> at the summit.
>
> Here are some options that I put together, please feel free to suggest
> others:
>
> *Option 1)* Stick with the original plan and divide the content being
> created for the first session into two separate presentations (one for
> discussing the group itself and the other for discussing the feedback from
> PTLs and next steps)
> Additional comment: The group currently is planning to include PTL feedback
> but skim over details since the slides will be made available after the
> summit and people could read the detailed items themselves at a later
> point.  Secondly, we didn't want to summarize/paraphrase PTL content too
> much since it could seem like we are putting words into their mouth.
>
> *Option 2)* Keep the first session as its being built and use this second
> session to get community advocates to give their views on the state of
> Product Management (PTLs, maybe Tim Bell on behalf of the user committee,
> Carol on behalf of enterprise, someone on behalf of operators, etc.).  The
> second session essentially becomes a panel with discussion on how the
> Product WH charter could help solve community challenges.
>
> *Option 3)* Use the second session to build a relationship between our
> initiative and the cross-project team to show how both solve for different
> levels or types of a common issue (e.g. both might deliver cross project
> items but one is tracking cross-project issues and optimization while the
> other is identifying user stories/epic that, potentially; require
> cross-project collaboration).  This session effectively becomes the how
> will work with cross-project to be successful with our charter and help
> them be successful with theirs too.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Shamail Tahir
> Cloud Architect, EMC
> t: @ShamailXD
> tz: Eastern Time
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org <javascript:;>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>


-- 
~sean