Open Stack

Sure - can kick it off.

-----Original Message-----
From: sean roberts [mailto:seanroberts66 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 3:23 PM
To: Shamail Tahir
Cc: product-wg at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Product] Second Session at Vancouver [Discussion Today]

Excellent breakdown. I like option 3.

I will be a bit late, carol can you get the meeting started?

On Wednesday, April 29, 2015, Shamail Tahir <itzshamail at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> We have been actively working on the content for the first session 
> [Glimpse At The Roadmap] but we have not had any discussions about the 
> second session yet [State of Product Management].  The original idea 
> when these sessions were submitted was to cover our groups charter and 
> overall progress in one session and leverage the other session to 
> share what we have learned so far [share PTL feedback].  The way we 
> have been building the first session [Glimpse At The Roadmap] 
> partially covers both of these topics.  I have added an agenda item 
> for us to discuss how we should leverage the second session since we 
> are lucky enough to have two sessions at the summit.
>
> Here are some options that I put together, please feel free to suggest
> others:
>
> *Option 1)* Stick with the original plan and divide the content being 
> created for the first session into two separate presentations (one for 
> discussing the group itself and the other for discussing the feedback 
> from PTLs and next steps) Additional comment: The group currently is 
> planning to include PTL feedback but skim over details since the 
> slides will be made available after the summit and people could read 
> the detailed items themselves at a later point.  Secondly, we didn't 
> want to summarize/paraphrase PTL content too much since it could seem 
> like we are putting words into their mouth.
>
> *Option 2)* Keep the first session as its being built and use this 
> second session to get community advocates to give their views on the 
> state of Product Management (PTLs, maybe Tim Bell on behalf of the 
> user committee, Carol on behalf of enterprise, someone on behalf of 
> operators, etc.).  The second session essentially becomes a panel with 
> discussion on how the Product WH charter could help solve community challenges.
>
> *Option 3)* Use the second session to build a relationship between our 
> initiative and the cross-project team to show how both solve for 
> different levels or types of a common issue (e.g. both might deliver 
> cross project items but one is tracking cross-project issues and 
> optimization while the other is identifying user stories/epic that, 
> potentially; require cross-project collaboration).  This session 
> effectively becomes the how will work with cross-project to be 
> successful with our charter and help them be successful with theirs too.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Shamail Tahir
> Cloud Architect, EMC
> t: @ShamailXD
> tz: Eastern Time
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org <javascript:;> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>


--
~sean
_______________________________________________
Product-wg mailing list
Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg