Open Stack

On Sun, Jun 17, 2018, 8:46 PM Ray Sun <xiaoquqi at gmail.com> wrote:

> OpenStackers,
> I have several questions for using kolla deployment in production:
>
1. Binary or source? Which one is mostly used in production
>

I've heard a lot more reports from people running source, but this is
anecdotal

2. Which one is easy to operation, like updating..
>

IMHO source is better for updates. With binary you sit around waiting for
packages to decide a patch or stable milestone is worthy of dropping new
packages. With source you can get things when they hit stable branches
upstream. I did exactly one binary deployment, waited forever for a patch I
needed, and swore off doing it that way forever more.

Operations are the same either way really.

...
> 3. Is there any document to describe how to operation kolla deployment
> OpenStack, seems it's not the quite same with the bare metal deployment.
>

The deployment docs are quite good. There isn't really a good ops guide
though. This is true of bare metal as well though ( in process of being
addressed presently). The IRC channel is terrific though, so if you hit a
wall, pop on there and ask for help or email this list with a tag like you
did here.

>
> Thanks.
>
> Best Regards
> -- Ray
>

Cherrs,
Erik

_______________________________________________
> Mailing list:
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe :
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20180617/d9375416/attachment.html>