[Openstack] [OpenStack][Kolla]Choose binary or source
xiaoquqi at gmail.com
Mon Jun 18 02:46:59 UTC 2018
Thanks for your reply.
I just consider one senario: if I deployed use source, if source is
updated, do I need to rebuild the docker image and do an update? Or is
there any better way?
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:22 AM Erik McCormick <emccormick at cirrusseven.com>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018, 8:46 PM Ray Sun <xiaoquqi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have several questions for using kolla deployment in production:
> 1. Binary or source? Which one is mostly used in production
> I've heard a lot more reports from people running source, but this is
> 2. Which one is easy to operation, like updating..
> IMHO source is better for updates. With binary you sit around waiting for
> packages to decide a patch or stable milestone is worthy of dropping new
> packages. With source you can get things when they hit stable branches
> upstream. I did exactly one binary deployment, waited forever for a patch I
> needed, and swore off doing it that way forever more.
> Operations are the same either way really.
>> 3. Is there any document to describe how to operation kolla deployment
>> OpenStack, seems it's not the quite same with the bare metal deployment.
> The deployment docs are quite good. There isn't really a good ops guide
> though. This is true of bare metal as well though ( in process of being
> addressed presently). The IRC channel is terrific though, so if you hit a
> wall, pop on there and ask for help or email this list with a tag like you
> did here.
>> Best Regards
>> -- Ray
>> Mailing list:
>> Post to : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>> Unsubscribe :
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Openstack