Open Stack

Hi y'all!

The ongoing debate in the LBaaS group is whether the concept of a
'Loadbalancer' needs to exist  as an entity. If it is decided that we need
it, I'm sure it'll have a unique ID. (And please feel free to join the
discussion on this as well, eh!)

Stephen


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Veera Reddy <veeraready at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Good idea to have unique id for each entry of network functions.
> So that we can configure multiple network function with different
> configuration.
>
>
> Regards,
> Veera.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Srikanth Kumar Lingala <
> srikanth.lingala at freescale.com> wrote:
>
>>  Hi-
>>
>> In the existing Neutron, we have FWaaS, LBaaS, VPNaaS …etc.
>>
>> In FWaaS, each Firewall has its own UUID.
>>
>> It is good to have a unique ID [UUID] for LBaaS also.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please share your comments on the above.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Srikanth.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list:
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>> Unsubscribe :
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list:
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe :
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>
>


-- 
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20140228/b04fe7d8/attachment.html>