[Openstack] Neutron vs. FlatDHCP -- what's the latest?
Tom Fifield
tom at openstack.org
Mon Dec 22 02:20:35 UTC 2014
On 22/12/14 11:00, Andrew Bogott wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I'm about to set up a new cloud, so for the second time this year I'm
> facing the question of Neutron vs. nova-network. In our current setup
> we're using nova.network.manager.FlatDHCPManager with floating IPs.
> This config has been working fine, and would probably be our first
> choice for the new cloud as well.
>
> At this point is there any compelling reason for us to switch to
> Neutron? My understanding is that the Neutron flat network model still
> doesn't support anything similar to floating IPs, so if we move to
> Neutron we'll need to switch to a subnet-per-tenant model. Is that
> still correct?
>
> I'm puzzled by the statement that " upgrades without instance downtime
> will be available in the Kilo release"[1] -- surely for such a path to
> exist, Kilo/Neutron would need to support all the same use cases as
> nova-network. If that's right and Neutron is right on the verge of
> supporting flat-with-floating then we may just cool our jets and wait to
> build the new cloud until Kilo is released. I have no particular reason
> to prefer Neutron, but I'd like to avoid betting on a horse right before
> it's put down :)
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Andrew
>
> [1]
> http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/nova-network-deprecation.html
Hi Andrew,
Latest from the -dev mailing list here:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-December/053355.html
Regards,
Tom
More information about the Openstack
mailing list