Open Stack

Yeah!! Jon, I'm agree with you about organization/separation LVM
groups, this is for very very very special situation.
Any case if I use nova pattern labeling via logical volumen creation
or via renaming label, I hope can switch the content of this custom
logical volument to use with openstack, an attach to a VM in future.



2012/10/24 Jonathan Proulx <jon at csail.mit.edu>:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 08:56:26PM +0200, Daniel Vázquez wrote:
> :Hi here!
> :
> :Can we create and use news logical volumes for own/custom use(out of
> :openstack) on nova-volumes openstack LVM group, and use it beside
> :openstack operational?
> :IMO it's LVM and no problem, but it has openstack collateral consequences?
>
> If you are talking about creating random logical volumes for
> non-openstack use in the same volume group nova-volume or cinder is
> using to create volumes (lv are in the same vg but don't otherwise
> interact), yes you can do that without ocnfusing openstack or having
> your volumes trampled.  For example only having one volume group and
> using that for operating system partitions as well as volume-<foo>
> volumes for cinder
>
> I don't think it's a particularly good idea from an organizational
> standpoint I'd rather have distinct vg's for each purpose so it is
> clear which resources are operating system and which are data, but in
> my environment (a private computing/research cloud with a small admin
> group and 1k users in a few 10's of closely related tenents) it's
> probably more an aesthetic than technical choice.  The larger and more
> diverse your situation the stronger I'd argue for keeping them in
> seperate VGs.
>
> -Jon