Open Stack

I would vote for 0 or 1 on the cost versus benefit. Option 0 is the least
overhead, but option 1 would be nice for a lot of reasons.

The downside to i18n of the logs and errors in the dilution of information
available to find solutions can be higher than the benefit of providing
messages in a native language.

The level of effort is certainly much much higher to provide option 3.

I'd vote for effort to go to improving the OpenStack core technology and
features over something that adds a lot of overhead and also some downside.


On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc at cn.ibm.com> wrote:

> I will vote option 3, because I think API-user-facing messages is as
> important as
> user interface messages. Since the workload of option 3 is not much more
> than option 2,
> option 3 will be a better choice.
>
> btw, I see documentation, e.g. OpenStack manuals, is excluded in these
> four options.
> Does that mean there is no comments against the globalization of
> documentation?
>
> Regards
> Daisy
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120507/9f0dda39/attachment.html>