Open Stack

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 05/04/2012 10:14 AM, Rouault, Jason (Cloud Services) wrote:
>
>> IMHO, if it is a quota related to a tenant or user, then managing it in
>> Keystone makes sense.
>>
>
> I think, as Eoghan mentioned, there was pretty broad agreement that
> *storing* quota information and even the CRUD operations on it were
> appropriate for Keystone to do, but the actual enforcement of quotas should
> be left in individual projects.
>

That's how I remember it, too.

Doug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120504/fe8b7203/attachment.html>