Open Stack

Hi Maru,

Sorry I have been taking long to come to you on this, I have revived
review  4529[1] which add the swift tests. I was talking to termie
about it sometime ago and the way we decided to do is to skip the
tests if Swift is not installed[2]. Feel free to add stubs as this is
not ideal.

I was working as well on container-sync and anonymous requests but was
not sure if this should go in for Folsom or for this release.

Cheers,
Chmouel.

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#change,4529
[2] Ideally I would love to have swift.common.*/swiftclient go to
another package but that's probably a discussion for Folsom summit.

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Maru Newby <mnewby at internap.com> wrote:
> I'd like to write unit tests for keystone.middleware.swift_auth in advance of some functional changes (adding support for unauthenticated container sync and referrer access).  It appears that swift_auth lacks unit tests, though.  Is this due to its dependency on swift, or is there another reason?
>
> Given that untested code is difficult to maintain, what would the best option be to add tests for swift_auth?  Ideally the module would just move to the swift repo, but if for some reason that's not an option, I'm prepared to use stubs.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Maru
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp