> On Friday, March 9, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Thor Wolpert wrote: > >> I thought a Foundation that paid for legal, marketing and core >> services; along with a hosted set of projects whose membership was >> based upon meritocracy was the model. That is and always has been the plan and can be seen in the existing detailed structure proposal: http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Foundation/Structure I think Josh is really focusing more on the details of membership on the Board, which is separate from the the governance and membership of the projects. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120309/0035e9ce/attachment.html>