On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Julien Danjou <julien.danjou at enovance.com>wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06 2012, Nick Barcet wrote: > > > Maybe the problem of discrepancy of configuration is more an issue for > > metering than for other components? At least that's my belief. > > […] > > Sure, I don't say that it's useless to have a centralized configuration > management in our case. I just think that it shouldn't be our problem to > fix that right now, and that we shouldn't spend our energy trying to fix > this. > > Deployers use configuration management tools to handle this in various > OpenStack components so far. I think it's saner, for now, to let this > continue until OpenStack provides something better all components can > rely on. > > I'm just having the feeling we're going out of scope here. > But this is just my opinion. :) > You make a good point. I tend to forget that the ops guys have tools for pushing config changes and restarting services. > > -- > Julien Danjou > // eNovance http://enovance.com > // ✉ julien.danjou at enovance.com ☎ +33 1 49 70 99 81 > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120606/dd803799/attachment.html>