Open Stack

On 07/18/2012 04:53 AM, Hua ZZ Zhang wrote:
> All networks information of all tenants are stored in one table. If the
> name is defined unique, it implicates all tenants have to make sure the
> name of new network will not be conflict with others even they don't
> know each other. the system has to tell the tenant that "the name has
> been used already by other tenants, please use another name to creat
> network". This might be a confusing constraint to user.

Exactly. Which is why I support the name = label (non-unique,
non-mandatory) position.

Best,
-jay