Open Stack

A) This wasn't documented at all (AFAIK), so there's no concern of breaking contracts.

B) Even if it's moved to an extension, would the call change from it's current form?:

    DELETE /tokens/{token_id}

I'm not sure what the extension convention is here.

-Dolph Mathews

On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Ziad Sawalha <ziad.sawalha at rackspace.com> wrote:

> If a client has bound to the contract XSD, they will break if we add this, won't they?
> 
> But… I don't know how many clients would have bound to the OS-KSADM contracts. We've been diligent and strict about not changing the core contract, but this is the first time we've been presented with a change to an extension like this.
> 
> I'd still lean towards the "correct" practice of adding this as another extension. Especially since that extension would only be adding a new method on an existing resource, so would not require complex naming changes…
> 
> Open to alternative points of view..
> 
> Z
> 
> 
> From: Jorge Williams <jorge.williams at rackspace.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:36:13 -0600
> To: Dolph Mathews <dolph.mathews at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Yee, Guang" <guang.yee at hp.com>, "openstack at lists.launchpad.net (openstack at lists.launchpad.net)" <openstack at lists.launchpad.net>, Ziad Sawalha <ziad.sawalha at rackspace.com>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Keystone: is revoke token API "officially" supported
> 
> Moving it to an extension makes sense to me.  Ziad, does it make sense to add it to OS-KSADM...or is this a different extension all together...revoke token extension?
> 
> -jOrGe W.
> 
> On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> 
>> It is definitely not a documented call (hence the "should this be removed?" comment in the implementation); if it were to be "promoted" from undocumented to an extension, I imagine it would belong in OS-KSADM.
>> 
>> - Dolph
>> 
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Yee, Guang <guang.yee at hp.com> wrote:
>> I see it implemented in the code as
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> DELETE /v2.0/tokens/{tokenId}
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> But it doesn’t appear to be documented in any of the WADLs.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Guang
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120126/570f735b/attachment.html>