On 12/11/2012 01:40 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com > <mailto:ayoung at redhat.com>> wrote: > > As a Keystone core developer, I have to say that I don't see it as > a huge burden to keep it in place. We want to maintain API > backward compatability, and removing it would break that. We > should deprecate it and get people to sign off on a complete > removal before taking it out of keystone. > > > Thanks for the feedback guy, if that's not much of troubles to keep it > in keystone we can leave it there. > > Cheers, > Chmouel. That being said, it probably could use better unit test coverage. Feel free to contribute code fragments toward that. http://admiyo.fedorapeople.org/openstack/covhtml/keystone_contrib_ec2_core.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20121211/ba4404d3/attachment.html>