Open Stack

On 12/11/2012 11:11 AM, Adam Young wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 01:40 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com 
>> <mailto:ayoung at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     As a Keystone core developer, I have to say that I don't see it
>>     as a huge burden to keep it in place.  We want to maintain API
>>     backward compatability, and removing it would break that.  We
>>     should deprecate it and get people to sign off on a complete
>>     removal before taking it out of keystone.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback guy, if that's not much of troubles to keep 
>> it in keystone we can leave it there.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chmouel.
> That being said,  it probably could use better unit test coverage. 
> Feel free to contribute code fragments toward that.
>
> http://admiyo.fedorapeople.org/openstack/covhtml/keystone_contrib_ec2_core.html
Make that:


http://admiyo.fedorapeople.org/openstack/covhtml/keystone_contrib_s3_core.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20121211/a4a5b602/attachment.html>