[Openstack] A confuse about the FlatDHCP network

Vishvananda Ishaya vishvananda at gmail.com
Wed Dec 5 19:12:58 UTC 2012

On Dec 5, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Lei Zhang <zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I am reading the http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/admin/content/libvirt-flat-dhcp-networking.html, I got the following deploy architecture. But there are several that I am confused.
> How and why ip range exist? It is necessary or not? The eth1 on the each physical machine own two ip( and Is that possible? In the nova-compute, the eth1 should be bridged by br100. the eth1 should not own any IP address, right?
The addresses will be moved on to the bridge. The point of having an ip address is so that things like rabbit and mysql can communicate over a different set of addresses than the guest network. Usually this would be done on a separate eth device (eth2) or vlan, but I was trying to keep

> In a better way, should we separate the nova-network/eth0 to the internet public switch for access the internet by all VMs. and the nova-compute/eth0 should be bind to a internal switch for admin access use. Is it right?
Ideally there are three eth devices / vlans a) public (for 99 adddresses in diagram) b) management (for 192 addresses in diagram) c) guest (for 10 addresses in diagram)

> -- 
> Lei Zhang
> Blog: http://jeffrey4l.github.com
> twitter/weibo: @jeffrey4l
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20121205/dff2db6f/attachment.html>

More information about the Openstack mailing list