[Openstack] growing fixed-ip network

Ravi Jagannathan reagul.2007 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 2 15:24:28 UTC 2012


Also.. builds are better created in Private IP and then prepped to release
to Public cloud. After all just an instance rinning OS is not yet there in
terms of APP stack.

Ravi.

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Narayan Desai <narayan.desai at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Christoph Kluenter <ck at iphh.net> wrote:
> > * Am Thu, Aug 02 2012 at 09:24:55 -0400 , schrieb Ravi Jagannathan:
> >> It should hop on to the next subnet block if available ( assuming that
> in
> >> LAN its a private address scheme ) .
> > We only use routable IPs. thats why we have some nets which can't be
> subnetted.
> > What difference does it make if its private adress space ?
>
> The major reason to use private address space is that there is likely
> a lot more of it than you have in public address space. if you have
> effectively unlimited fixed_ip space, you can give each project a lot.
> For example, we give each project a /23. While a user could
> potentially still run out of address space on our system, it hasn't
> happened yet with our workload.
>  -nld
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120802/40a00dd2/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack mailing list