Open Stack

Probably an extra audit system is required. I'm searching for solutions in
the IT market.

Regards

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Loic Dachary <loic at enovance.com> wrote:

> **
> On 04/24/2012 04:45 PM, Monsyne Dragon wrote:
>
>
>  On Apr 24, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
>  On 04/24/2012 03:06 PM, Monsyne Dragon wrote:
>
> Yes,  we emit bandwidth (bytes in/out) on a per VIF basis from each instance The event has the somewhat generic name of 'compute.instance.exists'  and is emitted on an periodic basis, currently by a cronjob.
> Currently, we only populate bandwidth data from XenServer, but if the hook is implemented for  the kvm, etc drivers, it will be picked up automatically for them as well.
>
> Note that we could report other metrics similarly.
>
>  Hi,
>
> Thanks for clarifying this. So you're suggesting that the metering agent
> should collect this data from the nova queue instead of extracting it from
> the system (interface, disk stats etc.) ? And for other openstack
> components ( as Nick Barcet suggests below ) the metering agent will have
> to find another way. Or do you have something else in mind ?
>
>
>  If it's something we have access to, we should emit it in those usage
> events.  As far as the other components, glance is already using the same
> notification system.  (there was a thread awhile back about putting it into
> openstack.common)  It would be nice to have all of the components using it.
>
>
>  Hi,
>
> I don't see a section in http://wiki.openstack.org/SystemUsageData about
> making sure all messages related to a billable event are accounted for. I
> mean, for instance, what if the event that says an instance is deleted is
> lost ? How is the billing software supposed to cope with that ? If it
> checks the status of all VM on a regular basis to deal with this, how can
> it figure out when the missed event occured ?
>
> It would be worth adding a short section about this in
> http://wiki.openstack.org/SystemUsageData . Or I can do it if you give me
> a hint.
>
> Cheers
>
>   Cheers
>
> On 04/24/2012 12:17 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
>
>  On 04/23/2012 10:45 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>  > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Brian Schott> <brian.schott at nimbisservices.com> <mailto:brian.schott at nimbisservices.com> <brian.schott at nimbisservices.com>> wrote:> >     Doug,> >     Do we mirror the table structure of nova, etc. and add>     created/modified columns? > > >     Or do we flatten into an instance event record with everything?  > > > I lean towards flattening the data as it is recorded and making a second> pass during the bill calculation. You need to record instance> modifications separately from the creation, especially if the> modification changes the billing rate. So you might have records for:> > created instance, with UUID, name, size, timestamp, ownership> information, etc.> resized instance, with UUID, name, new size, timestamp, ownership> information, etc.> deleted instance, with UUID, name, size, timestamp, ownership> information, etc.> > Maybe some of those values don't need to be reported in some cases, but> if you record a complete picture of the state of the instance then the> code that aggregates the event records to produce billing information> can use it to make decisions about how to record the charges.> > There is also the case where an instance is still no longer running but> nova thinks it is (or the reverse), so some sort of auditing sweep needs> to be included (I think that's what Dough called the "farmer" but I> don't have my notes in front of me).
>
>  When I wrote [1], one of the things that I never assumed was how agents
> would collect their information. I imagined that the system should allow
> for multiple implementation of agents that would collect the same
> counters, assuming that 2 implementations for the same counter should
> never be running at once.
>
> That said, I am not sure an event based collection of what nova is
> notifying would satisfy the requirements I have heard from many cloud
> providers:
> - how do we ensure that event are not forged or lost in the current nova
> system?
> - how can I be sure that an instance has not simply crashed and never
> started?
> - how can I collect information which is not captured by nova events?
>
> Hence the proposal to use a dedicated event queue for billing, allowing
> for agents to collect and eventually validate data from different
> sources, including, but not necessarily limiting, collection from the
> nova events.
>
> Moreover, as soon as you generalize the problem to other components than
> just Nova (swift, glance, quantum, daas, ...) just using the nova event
> queue is not an option anymore.
>
> [1] http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
>  On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
>
>
>  I think we have support for this currently in some fashion, Dragon?
>
> -S
>
>
>
> On 04/24/2012 12:55 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
>  Metering needs to account for the "volume of data sent to external network destinations " ( i.e. n4 in http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering ) or the disk I/O etc. This kind of resource is billable.
>
> The information described at http://wiki.openstack.org/SystemUsageData will be used by metering but other data sources need to be harvested as well.
>
>  --
> 	Monsyne M. Dragon
> 	OpenStack/Nova
> 	cell 210-441-0965
> 	work x 5014190
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary         Chief Research Officer
> // eNovance labs   http://labs.enovance.com
> // ✉ loic at enovance.com  ☎ +33 1 49 70 99 82
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>   --
> Monsyne M. Dragon
> OpenStack/Nova
> cell 210-441-0965
> work x 5014190
>
>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary         Chief Research Officer
> // eNovance labs   http://labs.enovance.com
> // ✉ loic at enovance.com  ☎ +33 1 49 70 99 82
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
-------------------------------------------
Luis Alberto Gervaso Martin
Woorea Solutions, S.L
CEO & CTO
mobile: (+34) 627983344
luis@ <luis.gervaso at gmail.com>woorea.es
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120424/9b465b5c/attachment.html>