On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 11:06 -0700, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > I can read the latest ones and see if I spot patterns. Anybody that > feels strongly for this please do the same and send your analysis to the > list for further discussion. I did some reading and I found examples for "Good summaries" http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-08-15-20.07.html http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-07-11-20.02.html and summaries that could be improved: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-09-27-21.03.html http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-09-20-21.02.html http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/openstack-meeting.2011-09-13-22.02.html One thing that seems clear is that the #info tag is not always used by the moderator, resulting in summaries that are way too dry to be meaningful. Some of the summaries have only a list of topic. On the other thand when #info is used more often, summaries seem to be much more intelligible. Do you think that adding a brief #info summary before changing topic would be a good habit? /stef