[Openstack] Keystone versioning and tarballs

Dolph Mathews dolph.mathews at gmail.com
Mon Oct 24 16:49:20 UTC 2011


Interesting...

And yes, keystone.version() is referenced in several places, so it should
apply to the docs as well... regardless of what it returns :)

Thanks,
-Dolph

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Joseph Heck <heckj at me.com> wrote:

> .3 means 3rd quarter
>
> I noticed that the developer docs aren't grabbing the version correctly to
> place them in when rendering... is keystone.version() the right place to get
> that information?
>
> If so, I'll make that edit to get it into the developer docs generation.
>
> -joe
>
> On Oct 24, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> > As long as the versioning scheme is self-consistent, I don't have any
> opinion on what we use.
> >
> > How do Openstack's named releases (cactus, diablo, essex) not work,
> though? (they're still sortable, right?)
> >
> > (and what was the .3 in 2011.3 supposed to mean? I assume it's not March,
> considering the October release...)
> >
> > -Dolph
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Mark McLoughlin [markmc at redhat.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 10:36 AM
> > To: Dolph Mathews
> > Cc: Ziad Sawalha; Thierry Carrez; openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> > Subject: RE: Keystone versioning and tarballs
> >
> > Hi Dolph,
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:35 +0000, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> >> We definitely need to publish a tarball for diablo.
> >
> > Cool. Will the version be 1.0 or 2011.3, though? :)
> >
> >> I recently refactored/centralized our versioning (we were reporting
> >> different versions in different places in the codebase). At the same
> >> time, I also set the `keystone.version()` response to 'essex-dev',
> >> since we haven't discussed codebase versioning very thoroughly, and it
> >> needed to be updated to *something* post-diablo. So, this is certainly
> >> open to feedback/suggestions/discussion!
> >
> > Well, a completely non-numeric version doesn't work IMHO. The easiest
> > path is to copy nova and glance, no? i.e diablo was 2011.3 and essex is
> > 2012.1
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mark.
> >
> > This email may include confidential information. If you received it in
> error, please delete it.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20111024/a7586ed0/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack mailing list