[Openstack] Keystone versioning and tarballs

Mark McLoughlin markmc at redhat.com
Mon Oct 24 15:36:43 UTC 2011


Hi Dolph,

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:35 +0000, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> We definitely need to publish a tarball for diablo.

Cool. Will the version be 1.0 or 2011.3, though? :)

> I recently refactored/centralized our versioning (we were reporting
> different versions in different places in the codebase). At the same
> time, I also set the `keystone.version()` response to 'essex-dev',
> since we haven't discussed codebase versioning very thoroughly, and it
> needed to be updated to *something* post-diablo. So, this is certainly
> open to feedback/suggestions/discussion!

Well, a completely non-numeric version doesn't work IMHO. The easiest
path is to copy nova and glance, no? i.e diablo was 2011.3 and essex is
2012.1

Cheers,
Mark.





More information about the Openstack mailing list