Open Stack

On Oct 14, 2011 10:54 p.m., "Jay Pipes" <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would advise NOT having any particular governance model for
> Satellite projects. The projects themselves should self-govern by the
> cultural norms of the programming language communities that are
> relevant to the project; since Satellite projects can be anything
> related to OpenStack -- just not the core reference implementations of
> the OpenStack APIs -- there really shouldn't be a governance model
> that attempts to control or limit this ecosystem. At least, that's
> just my opinion!

+1

The way I see it, HybridFox  as a tool with openstack support, should be
able to be listed without any changes (other than ensuring compatibility) .

Its tools like these that add value to openstack, while never being even
remotely close to core projects that Satellite should provide for.

If CI, SCM hosting etc are provided, it should be very, very loose. If any
attempt at control is asserted, Satellite will turn into an incubator.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20111014/e52a5554/attachment.html>