There is a bug describing this issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/849997 I will begin working on a patch. On 07/11/11 15:28, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > This is a bug. It is residual from previous code where source groups > didn't allow specific protocols to be specified. I think there may be > a bug already, but if not, can you please file one? If you see where > it is happening in the code a patch would also be appreciated. > > Vish > > On Nov 7, 2011, at 6:30 AM, David McNally wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We've run into an issue where we can add only a single rule per >> source-group to a security group. e.g: >> >> euca-authorize --protocol icmp -t -1:-1 --source-group groupB groupA >> >> will add a security rule as expected but if we cannot add a second >> rule to groupA with groupB as the source e.g.: >> >> euca-authorize --protocol tcp --port-range 22 --source-group groupB >> groupA >> ApiError: This rule already exists in group ert2 >> >> I can see where this is happening in the code and I was wondering if >> this behavior is by design or if it is intended to change in a future >> release? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dave >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack >> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack> >> Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net >> <mailto:openstack at lists.launchpad.net> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack >> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20111107/254118d7/attachment.html>