Hi Jay, Would it be better to have stuff like this go into a bug report? For that matter should anything that helps us reach parity with the Cloud Servers v1.0 spec be a bug report or a blueprint? I like the dependency graphs we get with Blueprint's as it helps track how close we are to reaching parity in some of the larger (meta) blueprints. I bounced the idea around some of the teams within Rackspace and blueprint seemed right for this one. Perhaps I was wrong. Dan -----Original Message----- From: "Jay Pipes" <jaypipes at gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 4, 2011 10:27am To: "Dan Prince" <dan.prince at rackspace.com> Cc: "Openstack" <openstack at lists.launchpad.net> Subject: Re: [Openstack] OS API server password generation Does anyone else feel it's a bit late to be targeting new blueprints for Cactus since we're 2 weeks from branch merge proposal freeze? http://wiki.openstack.org/CactusReleaseSchedule -jay On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Dan Prince <dan.prince at rackspace.com> wrote: > We created a blueprint on adding support for password generation when creating servers. This is needed for Openstack API/Cloud Servers API v1.0 parity. > > We are anxious to get this work started so if you are interested please review the following: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/openstack-api-server-passwords > > http://etherpad.openstack.org/openstack-api-server-passwords > > Dan Prince > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >