[Openstack] OS API server password generation
jaypipes at gmail.com
Fri Mar 4 18:14:23 UTC 2011
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Dan Prince <dan.prince at rackspace.com> wrote:
> Hi Jay,
> Would it be better to have stuff like this go into a bug report? For that matter should anything that helps us reach parity with the Cloud Servers v1.0 spec be a bug report or a blueprint?
No, blueprint is totally fine. I encourage large features to be in
blueprints. I was just referring to the freeze deadline in a couple
weeks, and to the fact that blueprints designated to be completed for
Cactus were supposed to be completed and prioritized more than a month
> I like the dependency graphs we get with Blueprint's as it helps track how close we are to reaching parity in some of the larger (meta) blueprints.
> I bounced the idea around some of the teams within Rackspace and blueprint seemed right for this one. Perhaps I was wrong.
Nope, blueprint is totally cool. It's just the timing :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jay Pipes" <jaypipes at gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 4, 2011 10:27am
> To: "Dan Prince" <dan.prince at rackspace.com>
> Cc: "Openstack" <openstack at lists.launchpad.net>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] OS API server password generation
> Does anyone else feel it's a bit late to be targeting new blueprints
> for Cactus since we're 2 weeks from branch merge proposal freeze?
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Dan Prince <dan.prince at rackspace.com> wrote:
>> We created a blueprint on adding support for password generation when creating servers. This is needed for Openstack API/Cloud Servers API v1.0 parity.
>> We are anxious to get this work started so if you are interested please review the following:
>> Dan Prince
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
More information about the Openstack