Open Stack

I believe we discussed this in the December timeframe. I'm still a fan of
the idea. 

On 7/11/11 2:37 PM, "Eric Day" <eday at oddments.org> wrote:

>We did discuss using IPV6 addresses as IDs months ago (IRC and email),
>but I don't remember why we decided not to. It may have been due to
>current adoption. I think it was pvo who originally had the idea.
>
>-Eric
>
>On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 07:24:39PM +0000, Chris Behrens wrote:
>> 
>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
>> 
>> > On Jul 11, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Eric Day wrote:
>> > 
>> >>> How is
>> >>> 
>> >>> nova-<account>-<instance uuid>
>> >>> 
>> >>> any different than:
>> >>> 
>> >>> AAAABBBB-CCCC-DDDD-EEEE-FFFFGGGGHHHH
>> >>> 
>> >>> Where AAAA/BBBB/CCCC (or some subset of them) are
>>reserved/regulated?
>> >> 
>> >> Nothing, if DDDD-EEEE-FFFFGGGGHHHH is a full UUID. If we compare to
>> >> swift, the account prefix is a UUID too. The account prefix could be
>> >> fixed for a session or passed in to every request depending on how
>> >> things are decided.
>> > 
>> > 	<sigh>
>> > 
>> > 	It's a shame that the ipv6 proposal was never more fully considered.
>>That would handle the uniqueness, with the added benefit of providing
>>simple zone routing via DNS, with the exact same 128-bit/32 char size.
>> 
>> I don't I remember that proposal, but that's such a neat idea.  Was
>>anything discussed at all in Santa Clara regarding encoding zone
>>information in the instance identifier?  I apparently missed the
>>instance identifier discussion somehow.
>> 
>> - Chris
>> 
>> 
>> This email may include confidential information. If you received it in
>>error, please delete it.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, please delete it.